IJPR.2018.187

Type of Article:  Case Report

Volume 6; Issue 6 (December 2018)

Page No.: 2936-2939

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2018.187

EFFORT WITH DETERMINATION INFLUENCE RESULTS! PARENT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSIOTHERAPY TREATMENT SESSIONS FOR CHILDREN WITH SENSORY PROCESSING DISORDER – AN INTERESTING CASE REPORT

Hulsha Paudyal *1, Dhanesh Kumar KV 2.

*1 Postgraduate, NITTE Institute of Physiotherapy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

2 Professor and Principal, NITTE Institute of Physiotherapy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Address for Correspondence: Hulsha Paudyal, Postgraduate, NITTE Institute of Physiotherapy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. E-Mail:  hulshap@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: Sensory processing disorder, (SPD) is a condition that exists when sensory signals do not get organized into appropriate responses. The relationship between mind and behavior is altered.

Case Report: 15 years old- girl diagnosed clinically as SPD, who underwent eight weeks of physical therapy rehabilitation which included counseling to the caregiver for their active participation in the treatment, behavioral modification, and physical therapy. A sensory profile was used as an outcome measure. Sensory profile caregiver questionnaire was taken on day 1, at the end of 4th week, and at the end of 8th week.

Result: Documented improvements in auditory, visual, activity level, body position, movement touch and emotional/social components of the Sensory profile were noted.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation with the active involvement of parents improves the children with SPD.

Key words: Sensory processing disorder, children, exercise, parents, sensory profile, physical therapy, Behavior modification.

REFERENCES

  1. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child: Understanding hidden sensory challenges. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  2. Sensory Integration Therapies for Children With Developmental and Behavioral Disorders. PEDIATRICS. 2012;129(6):1186-1189.
  3. Sealy J, Glovinsky I. Strengthening the reflective functioning capacities of parents who have a child with a neurodevelopmental disability through a brief, relationship-focused intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2016;37(2):115-124.
  4. Bundy A. Sensory integration. Philadelphia: F A Davis; 2015.
  5. Bar-Shalita T, Vatine J, Parush S. Sensory modulation disorder: a risk factor for participation in daily life activities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2008;50(12):932-937.
  6. Dunn W. The Sensations of Everyday Life: Empirical, Theoretical, and Pragmatic Considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001;55(6):608-620.
  7. Cosbey J, Johnston S, Dunn M. Sensory Processing Disorders and Social Participation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2010;64(3):462-473.
  8. Bundy A, Shia S, Qi L, Miller L. How Does Sensory Processing Dysfunction Affect Play?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2007;61(2):201-208.
  9. Dunn W. The Sensory Profile: User’s Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; (1999).
  10. Liao S, Hwang Y, Chen Y, Lee P, Chen S, Lin L. Home-based DIR/Floortime™ Intervention Program for Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Preliminary Findings. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 2014;34(4):356-367.

Cite this article: Hulsha Paudyal, Dhanesh Kumar KV. EFFORT WITH DETERMINATION INFLUENCE RESULTS! PARENT’S PARTICIPATION IN PHYSIOTHERAPY TREATMENT SESSIONS FOR CHILDREN WITH SENSORY PROCESSING DISORDER – AN INTERESTING CASE REPORT. Int J Physiother Res 2018;6(6):2936-2939. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2018.187