IJPR.2017.248
Type of Article: Original Research
Volume 5; Issue 6 (December 2017)
Page No.: 2552-2559
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2017.248
EFFECT OF COMBINED MANUAL THERAPY ON NECK PAIN AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN POST – OPERATIVE HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS – A PRE – POST EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
Renu Pattanshetty 1, Erohit khanna *2.
1 Associate Professor and Head, Department of Oncology Physiotherapy, KLEU Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
*2 Post graduate student (oncology physiotherapy), KLEU Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Erohit khanna, Post graduate student (oncology physiotherapy), KLEU Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi – 590010, Karnataka, India. Contact No.: +91 9611726520 E-Mail: kerohit@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Background: The burden of head and neck cancer in India has been increasing in recent years. Despite evidence that physical therapy exists throughout phases of treatment for head and neck cancer patients , combined treatment of manual therapy in the form of mobilization, muscle energy technique and soft tissue mobilization techniques are rarely available for clinical practice. Hence, the present study was taken up.
Aim: To study the effect of combined manual therapy in form of mobilization, Muscle energy technique and soft tissue mobilization on neck pain, quality of life, mobility in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
Settings and Design: The experimental study was undertaken in a tertiary care referral hospital over a period of three months.
Materials and Methods: A total of fifteen(15) subjects including eleven (11) males and four (4) females post operative head and neck cancer subjects were given combined manual therapyin the form of cervical mobilization, muscle energy technique and Soft tissue Mobilization for duration of a week during the hospitalisation phase. Pain was assessed using Numeric pain rating Scale, Range of motion of cervical joint, shoulder joint and Temporomandibular joint, Functional assessment was done using Neck disability index and FACT H&N Questionnaire. Statistical Analysis was done using SPSS Version 0.21. Students dependent ‘t’ test was used to analyse the pre and post treatment difference in all outcome measures.
Results: The study demonstrated improvement in all the outcome measures in the study, the significant difference was seen in with p≤0.001 except cervical rotation and shoulder range of motion.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated Pain reduction, Improvement in Cervical, TMJ and shoulder range of motion, Improved Quality of life and reduction in disability following combined manual therapy approach.
KEY WORDS: Head and Neck Cancer, Cervical Mobilization, Muscle energy technique, Soft tissue mobilization , quality of life, manual therapy, TMJ
REFERENCES
- World Health Organization. Cancer. WHO definition of palliative care.
- Harrison LB, Sessions RB, Hong WK, editors. Head and neck cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
- Kulkarni MR. Head and neck cancer burden in India. Int J Head and Neck Surg. 2013 Jan;4(1):29-35.
- Datta S, Chaturvedi P, Mishra A, Pawar P. A review of Indian literature for association of smokeless tobacco with malignant and premalignant diseases of head and neck region. Indian J Cancer 2014;51:200-8
- Cassidy J, Bissett D.,OBE, R.A.S.,Payne M, Morris-Stiff G, editors. Oxford handbook of oncology. OUP Oxford; 2015 Aug 13
- Gugliotti M. The use of mobilization, muscle energy technique, and soft tissue mobilization following a modified radical neck dissection of a patient with head and neck cancer. Rehabilitation Oncology. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):3-8.
- Carter BC. Physical therapy treatment for a patient with complex rehabilitation needs during and after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer (Doctoral dissertation, FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY).
- McNeely ML, Parliament M, Courneya KS, Haykowsky M. Resistance exercise for post dissection shoulder pain: Three case reports. Physiother Theory Prac. 2004;20:4156
- Maitland GD. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation. 6th ed. London: ButterworthHeinemann; 2001
- Greenman PE. Principles of Manual Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
- Cyriax JH. Cyriax’s Illustrated Manual of Orthopaedic Medicine. 2nd ed. Woburn, MA: ButterworthHeinemann; 2000
- Von Doersten PG, Cruz RM, Rasgon BM, Quesenberry Jr CP, Mlsinger Jr RL. Relation between age and head and neck cancer recurrence after surgery: a multivariate analysis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 1995 Sep;113(3):197-203.
- Lees J. Incidence of weight loss in head and neck cancer patients on commencing radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology centre. European journal of cancer care. 1999 Sep;8(3):133-6.
- Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head & neck. 1993 Nov 1;15(6):485-96.
- Ringash J, Bezjak A, O’sullivan B, Redelmeier DA. Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients. Quality of Life Research. 2004 May 1;13(4):725-33.
- Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. Disability and rehabilitation. 2010 Jan 1;32(8):622-8.
- Schenk R, Adelman K, Rousselle J. The effects of muscle energy technique on cervical range of motion. Journal of manual & manipulative therapy. 1994 Jan 1;2(4):149-55.
- Hunter G. Specific soft tissue mobilization in the management of soft tissue dysfunction. Manual Therapy. 1998 Feb 28;3(1):2-11.