IJPR.2017.230

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 6 (November 2017)

Page No.: 2471-2476

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2017.230

EFFECTS OF PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD VERSUS LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON COLONY COUNT ON VENOUS ULCERATION

Nesrien A. Abd-Elrashid  *1, Ahmed S. Ahmed 2, Ahmed M.Kenawy 3.

*1 Physical Therapy department of surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.

2,3 Department for Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Nesrien A. Abd-Elrashid, Lecturer, P.T for Surgery, Depart, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. Egypt. E-Mail: nessrien.afify@pt.cu.edu.eg

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) versus low level laser therapy (LLLT) on venous ulcer by using colony count (CC). Thirty patients with venous ulcer were participated in the present study and randomly divided into two equal groups; group A, which received pulsed electromagnetic field with their traditional medical treatment and group B, which was treated with low level laser therapy with traditional medical treatment. CC had been measured before treatment and after 6 weeks from the beginning of treatment for both groups. Results showed that there were NO significant differences in CC in LLLT group versus PEMF group.

Key words: Venous Ulcer, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field, Low Level Laser Therapy, And Colony Count.

REFERENCES

  1. Simon, D.A.; Dix, F.P. McCollum, C.N.: Management of venous leg ulcers. Br. Med. J. 2004;328:1358–1362.
  2. O Flynn N, Vaughan M and Kelley K. Diagnosis and management of varicose veins in the legs: NICE guide- line. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64:314–315.
  3. Fu X, Sheng Z, Cherry GW, Li Q. Epidemiological study of chronic dermal ulcers in China. Wound Repair Regen Jan-Feb;1998;6(1):21–27.
  4. De Araujo T, Valencia I, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Managing the patient with venous ulcers. Ann Intern Med Feb 18;2003;138(4):326–334.
  5. Deborah A Simon, Fracis P Dix, Cahrles N Mccollummanagementof venous leg ulcers Clinical review BMJ 2004; 1358-1362.
  6. Blair SD, Wright DDI, Backhouse CM, Riddle E, McCollum CN. Sustained compression and the healing of chronic ulcers. BMJ 1988;297:1159-61.
  7. Zimmet S. Venous leg ulcers: modern evaluation and management. Dermato Surg 1999;25:236–241.
  8. El Negmy, E.H.: Significance of electromagnetic field as a noninvasive physicaltherapy tool Abstract book, the 10.International scientific conference, Fac. Of P.T., Cairo University, 2007.
  9. Scardino,Swaim, S.F., Sartin, E.A., Steiss, J.E., Spano, J.S., Hofman,C.F.,Coolman, S.L. and Peppin, B.L.. “Evaluation of treatment with a pulsed electromagnetic field on wound healing, clinico pathologic varialdes, and central nervous system activity of dogs” Am-J-Vet Res. 1998 sep;59(9):1177-1181.
  10. Litscher, Integrative laser medicine and high techacupuncture at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, Europe,Evidence-BasedComplementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 103109, 21 pages, 2012
  11. Pal G, Dutta A, Mitra K, Amat A.: Effect of low intensity laser interaction with human skin fibroblast cells using fiber-optic nanomprobes Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2007;86:252 261.
  12. Cheryl Majeske Reliability of Wound Surface Area Measurement, PHYS THER.1992;72:138-141.
  13. Geissmann Q open CFU, a new free and open – source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects.2013
  14. Athanasiou,A.Karkambounassk,S., Batistatou, A, A, A. Lykoudis, E, Katsaraki, A. Kartsiouni, T.Papalois, A. and Evangelou, A.: The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secondary skin wound healing: an experimental study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(5):362-368.
  15. Pilla, A.A.: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications of Time-Varying and Static Magnetic Fields”. Handbook of BiologicalEffects of Electromagnetic Fields Third Edition: Biological and Medical Aspects ofElectromagnetic Fields, 2007. Barnes FS andGreene Baum B. editors, page 357, 2007
  16. Tepper Om, et al. Electromagnetic Fields Increase In Vitro And In Vivo Angiogenesis Through Endothelial Release Of FGFZ. FASEB J 2004;18:1231-1233.
  17. Litscher. Integrative laser medicine and high-tech acupuncture at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, Europe,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, Article ID 103109, 21 pages, 2012.
  18. K. Akyol and M. Güngörmüş. Effect of biostimulation on healing of bone defects in diabetic rats. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 2010;28(3):411–416.
  19. Luza, J. and Hubacek, J. In vitro He-Ne laser effect on some immunological functions of the polymorphonuclears and monocytes in rabbits”. Acta. Univ. Palaeki – Olomuc. Fac. Med. 2001;140:43-46.

Cite this article: Nesrien A. Abd-Elrashid, Ahmed S. Ahmed, Ahmed M.Kenawy. EFFECTS OF PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD VERSUS LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON COLONY COUNT ON VENOUS ULCERATION. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5(6):2471-2476. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.230
Share this Research
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this pagePin on Pinterest