IJPR.2017.229

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 6 (November 2017)

Page No.: 2464-2470

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2017.229

TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION VERSUS ELECTRICAL VESTIBULAR STIMULATION ON BALANCE IN GERIATRICS PARKINSONIAN PATIENTS

Islam Mahmoud Abd-allah Al-Azab *1, Tamer I. Abo Elyazed 2, Amira Mohamed El- Gendy 3.

*1 Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular disorder and its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University.

2 Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Internal medicine, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Beni-Suef University.

3 Lecturer at Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University.

Address for correspondence: Dr. Islam Mahmoud Abd-allah Al-Azab, Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular disorder and its Surgery. Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. Egypt. E-Mail: islam_alazab2005@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background:  The aim of this work was to investigate the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electrical galvanic vestibular stimulation on balance in geriatrics parkinsonian patients.

Subjects and Methods: sixty geriatrics Parkinsonism male patients represent the sample of this study. The patients’ ages ranged from 60 to 70 years with a mean value of 65.983 ± 2.76 years. They were assigned randomly into three equal groups; the study group one (G1) and the study group two (G2) and the control group (G3). The control group G3 treated by selected therapeutic physical exercise program. The study group G1 treated by the same program of treatment as the control group in addition to Transcranial magnetic stimulation TMS. The study group (G2) treated by the same program of treatment as G3 in addition to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). The duration of treatment was three months, three times per week.  The different aspects of dynamic balance (overall stability, anteroposterior stability and mediolateral stability indices) were assessed pre and post treatment objectively by Biodex balance system and clinically by Short Form of Berg Balance Scale (SFBBS) in all groups.

Results: Comparison of each variable pre and post treatment in each group revealed a significant improvement in all different parameters in study groups (G1 & G2) P 0.05; however the control group showed a significant improvement only in anteroposterior stability index.

Conclusion: Transcranial magnetic stimulation and GVS have significant effect on treatment of balance disorders in geriatrics Parkinsonism patients.

Key words: Parkinsonism, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, galvanic vestibular stimulation, Balance.

REFERENCES

  1. Joseph M. Savitt, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: molecules to medicine Journal of Clinical Investigation 2006;116:1744-1754.
  2. Barker S P Changes in Gait, Balance, and Function with Vestibular Rehabilitation. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2004.
  3. Blanke O, Lopez C, Lenggenhager B. Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations. Exp BrainResearch 2008;184(2):211-21.
  4. Maria Nilsson. Balance performance in people with Parkinson’s disease. Lund University, Faculty of Medicine Doctoral Dissertation Series 2009: Pages 7- 15.
  5. Janicak PG, O’Reardon RJ et al .Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a comprehensive summary of safety experience from acute exposure, extended exposure, and during reintroduction treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69(2):222–232.
  6. Vadalà et al. Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic therapy in Parkinson’s disease, Behavioral and Brain Functions. 2015;11:26
  7. Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1471–1476.
  8. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985;(8437):1106–1107.
  9. Greenberg BD, Malone DA, Friehs GM, et al. Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. 2006;31(11):2384–2393.
  10. Hiscock A, Miller S, Rothwell J, Tallis RC, Pomeroy VM. Informing dose-finding studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor function: a qualitative systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:228–249.
  11. Helt, D.G., Foulds, R. Vestibular stimulation and its effects on muscle tone. Bioengineering Conference, 2004;17-18 April:7 – 8.
  12. McLaughlin JA. Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences: step by step. WADS Worth Australia, 2002; Pp73-96.
  13. Bluman A. Elementary statistics, a step by step approach 5 th ed. Mc Graw Hill Higher education, Boston, New York, London 2004;431-583.
  14. Guskiewiez K , perrin D. Research and clinical application of Assessing balance. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation 1996;5:46-63.
  15. Adoms RD, Victor M. Principles of neurol 1049-2nd ed, Mc Grow-Hill, New York, 1989, pp: 30-67.
  16. Fattal D. Comprehensive management of vestibular disorders. Spring. 2002;3:1-5.
  17. Williams, Stephen M. Factor analysis of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Cortex 1986;22:325-26.
  18. Cerasa A, Koch G, Donzuso G, Mangone G, Morelli M, Brusa L et al A network centred on the inferior frontal cortex is critically involved in levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Brain 2015;138(2):414–427.
  19. Anninos P, Adamopoulos A, Kotini A, et al. MEG evaluation of Parkinson’s diseased patients after external magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Belg 2007;107(1):5–10.
  20. Krause P., Edrich T. and Straub A. Lumbar repetitive magnetic stimulation reduces spastic tone increase of the lower limbs. Spinal cord 2004;42(2):67-72.
  21. David Conradsson, Niklas Löfgren, Håkan Nero et al. The Effects of Highly Challenging Balance Training in Elderly With Parkinson’s Disease.A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair.2015;29(9):827–836.

Cite this article: Islam Mahmoud Abd-allah Al-Azab, Tamer I. Abo Elyazed, Amira Mohamed El- Gendy. TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION VERSUS ELECTRICAL VESTIBULAR STIMULATION ON BALANCE IN GERIATRICS PARKINSONIAN PATIENTS. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5(6):2471-2476. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.230
Share this Research
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someonePrint this pagePin on Pinterest