IJPR.2017.175

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 4 (July 2017)

Page No.: 2215-2219

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2017.175

CORRELATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC BALANCE WITH KNEE PROPRIOCEPTION IN NORMALS

Dhwani V Jain *1, Mugdha Oberoi 2, Veena Krishnanand 3.

*1 Research Intern, K. J. Somaiya College of Physiotherapy, Everard Nagar, Sion, Mumbai, India.

2 Assistant Professor, K. J. Somaiya College Of Physiotherapy, Everard Nagar, Sion, Mumbai, India.

3 Professor and Head of Department, K. J. Somaiya College Of Physiotherapy, Everard Nagar, Sion, Mumbai, India.

Address for Correspondence: Ms. Dhwani V Jain, Research Intern, K. J. Somaiya College of Physiotherapy, Everard Nagar, Sion, Mumbai- 400022, India. E-Mail: dvjain94@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background:  Human balance depends on coordinated integration of sensory input from somatosensory, vestibular and visual systems. Proprioception includes 3 components: sense of position, sense of movement and sense of force. Most of the injuries have the potential to decrease proprioception and subsequently balance. It is important to understand the relation between proprioception and balance in young adults. Thus this study aimed at co-relating static and dynamic balance with knee proprioception in Normals.

Purpose of the study: To understand the correlation of balance with knee proprioception.

Materials and Methods: Young asymptomatic adults (N=50),equal males (n=25) and females (n=25) between the age group of 18-30years (mean age=21.2) were assessed for knee joint proprioception at 60⁰  using universal goniometer, static balance  using Balance Error Scoring System(BESS) and dynamic balance using Star excursion balance test (SEBT).

Result: There is a weak negative correlation [r = -0.3161(rt) and r = -0.1599(lt)] of knee joint proprioception error with dynamic balance and a weak positive correlation [r = 0.3358(rt) and r = 0.2912(lt)] of knee joint proprioception error with static balance error.

Conclusion: The study concludes that lesser the knee joint proprioception error better is the dynamic balance. And lesser the knee joint proprioception error lesser is the static balance error.

KEY WORDS: Static balance, dynamic balance, knee proprioception error, star excursion balance test, balance error scoring system.

REFERENCES

  1. Reza Bhaktiari. Evaluation of static and dynamic balance and knee proprioception in young professional soccer players. Annals of biological research, 2012;3(6):2867-2873.
  2. Madhavi Lokhande and Jaimala Shetty, Assessment of knee joint proprioception in weight bearing and non-weight bearing positions in normal subjects. JKIMSU 2013;2.
  3. Emily A. Stuart; Richard E. Rodenberg; Meredith Dotson; Julie Young; James P. MacDonald. Reliabilty measures of BESS as administered by certified athletic trainers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. MAY 2015;47(5S):649. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000478487.22545.07
  4. Interrater reliabilty of star excursion balance test, Phillip Gribble (University of Toledo) and Sarah kelly(university of Sydney), J Athl Train, 2013 Sept-Oct.
  5. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. Journal of athletic training. 2012 May;47(3):339-57.
  6. Balance Error Scoring System, by researchers and clinicians at the University of North Carolina’s Sports Medicine research laboratory.
  7. Measurement of limb length, David Magee, 6th edition, 719-722.
  8. L.Riemann and M.Lephart, The sensorimotor system, part 2- The role of proprioception in motor control and functional joint stability, J Athl. Training 2002..
  9. Anne Shumway cook, Motor control (5th edition).
  10. Eva Hansson, Effect of vision, proprioception and position of vestibular organ on postural sway; Acta oto-laryngologica 2010 Aug 3.

Cite this article: Dhwani V Jain, Mugdha Oberoi, Veena Krishnanand. CORRELATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC BALANCE WITH KNEE PROPRIOCEPTION IN NORMALS. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5(4):2215-2219. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.175