IJPR.2018.149

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 4 (August 2018)

Page No.: 2791-2796

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2018.149

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF SUBOCCIPITAL CRANIAL BASE RELEASE AND SUBOCCIPITAL FASCIAL SCRAPING ON THE EXTENSIBILITY OF OTHER SEGMENTS OF POSTERIOR KINETIC CHAIN

Yadav P *1, Arora M 2, Bhardwaj P 3.

*1 Post Graduation Student of Physiotherapy, Sardar Bhagwan Singh Post Graduate   Institute Of Biomedical Sciences And Research, Balawala, Dehradun, India.

2 Head of Department,  Department of Physiotherapy, Sardar Bhagwan Singh   Postgraduate Institute Of Biomedical Sciences And Research, Balawala, Dehradun, India.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Sardar Bhagwan Singh Postgraduate Institute Of Biomedical Sciences And Research, Balawala, Dehradun, India.

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Yadav P, Physiotherapy Department, Sardar Bhagwan Singh PG Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Research, Balawala, Dehradun-248001, India. E-Mail: ptpoojayadav90@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: A Myofascial Kinetic Chain  is a group of muscles that are connected through  the fascia and are longitudinally positioned in the human body. If one of the structures within a meridian develops tension it will be distributed along entire myofascial continuum. Myofascial release techniques can be used to release the restricted or pathological fascial structures. Myofascial release is a hands-on soft tissue technique that facilitates stretch into the restricted fascia. Fascial scraping is done by superficial maneuvering of fascia by repeated fascial stroking in an effort to break the fascial adhesions.

Methodology: The study was performed on 30 girls with age 18-26 who has dysfunctions in posterior kinetic chain, of which 15 were in each of the two categories. Group A- treated with cranial base release and group B- treated with fascial scraping. Suboccipital length, Lumbar ROM, Pelvic tilt and Hamstring length was measured in 15 subjects of both the groups before the treatment and after 1 week of treatment.

Results:  The analysis between the groups was done by using paired t-test and independent   sample test. The analysis revealed significant result within the group and insignificant between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Result of the study concluded that there is significant effect of both the techniques of Myofascial Release (Cranial Base Release and Fascial Scraping) of one segment in the extensibility of other segments of posterior kinetic chain.

Key words: Myokinetic Chain, Superficial Back Line, Cranial Base Release, Fascial Scraping.

REFERENCES

  1. Amantea DV, Novaes AP, Campolongo GD, Barros TP. The importance of the postural evaluation in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. ACTA ORTOP BRAS. 2004; 12(3):155-159.
  2. Manheim CJ. The Myofascial Release Manual. Third edition, Slack Incorporated.
  3. Stecco C, Veronica M, Andrea P, Fabrice D, Raffaele DC.The fascia: the forgotten structure. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology.2011;116( 3): 127-138.
  4. Myers TW. Anatomy Trains: Myoascial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. Second Edition.Churchill Livingstone,Elsevier;2009.
  5. Dover G, Powers ME. Reliability of Joint Position Sense and Force-reproduction Measures During Internal and External Rotation of the Shoulder.Journal of Athletic training.2003;38(4): 304-310.
  6. Jagtap PK, Mandale SD.The Effect of Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Tightness Patients.Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2015;4(33) :5682-5689.
  7. Barnes MF.The Basic Science Of Myofascial Release: morphologic changes in connective tissue. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.1997;1(4):231-238.
  8. Siqueira MD, Barbalho M, Moraes PH, Rodrigues PHL. The Effects Of The Gua Sha Technique (Western View)On The Recuperation Of  Flexibility Of The Posterior Chain In Parkinson : Case Study.European Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.2016; 4 (1):24-39.
  9. Myers T. Anatomy Trains- Early Dissective Evidence.DY Trains.2006 ;15-18.
  10. Hertling D and Kessler RM. Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders. Third Edition.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.2005.
  11. Benjamin M.The fascia of the limbs and back-a review. Journal of Anatomy.2009;vol 214:pages 1-18.
  12. Taylor D, Fryer G,McLaughlin P. The Effect of Cervical Spine Isometric Contract-Relax Technique on Hamstring Extensibility. Journal of Australas Chiropractice and Osteopath.2003;11(1):21-26.
  13. Eldesoky MT, Abutaleb EE. Influence of Bilateral and unilateral flatfoot on pelvic Alignment. International Journal of Medical, Health, Biomedical, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Engineering.2015; 9(8): 641-645.
  14. Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignmentin a standing position.Gait & Posture.2007; 25: 127–134.
  15. Wilke J, Krause F, Vogt L, Banzer W.What Is Evidence-Based About Myofascial Chains: A Systematic Review.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2016;97:454-61.
  16. Yucesoy CA, Koopman BHFJM, Baan GC, Grootenboer HJ, Huijing PA.Effects of inter- and extramuscular myofascial force transmission on adjacent synergistic muscles: assessment by experiments and finite-element modelling.Journal of Biomechanics.2003; 36 :1797–1811.
  17. Kristin Mckenney, Elder AS, Elder C, Hutchins A. Myofascial release as a treatment for orthopaedic conditions: A systemic review. Journal of athletic training.2013;48(4):522-527.
  18. Cuccia A, Caradonna C. The Relationship Between the Stomatognathic System And Body Posture.CLINICS.2009;64(1):61-6. 

Cite this article: Yadav P, Arora M, Bhardwaj P. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFECT OF SUBOCCIPITAL CRANIAL BASE RELEASE AND SUBOCCIPITAL FASCIAL SCRAPING ON THE EXTENSIBILITY OF OTHER SEGMENTS OF POSTERIOR KINETIC CHAIN. Int J Physiother Res 2018;6(3):2791-2796. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2018.149