IJAR.2022.113

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 10; Issue 2 (June 2022)

Page No.: 8342-8345

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2022.113

Arcuate Foramen: An Anatomical Variation in the Atlas Vertebrae

Buddhadeb Ghosh *1, Akhtaruzzaman 2, Md Naushad Alam Dilkash 3.

*1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, India.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Jalpaiguri Government Medical College & Hospital, West Bengal, India.

3Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, India.

Corresponding Author:  Dr. Buddhadeb Ghosh, Department of Anatomy, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, India, 854106. Mob +918894114210. E-Mail: debanatomy@gmail.com; buddhadeb.ghosh@alkarimuniversity.edu.in

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-3817  

ABSTRACT

Background: Arcuate foramen is a variation in the posterior arch of atlas vertebrae. It is commonly called as Kimmerle’s anomaly, also known as Ponticulus Posticus. It is the product of the complete or incomplete ossification of the posterior atlantooccipital membrane over the vertebral artery groove resulting in the formation of arcuate foramen containing the vertebral artery and the posterior branch of the first cervical spinal nerve.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to identify the percentage of incidence of arcuate foramen in the atlas and its clinical important.

Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, India with 32 adult dried atlas vertebrae.

Results: We found four (12.5%) atlas with arcuate foramen. One atlas having complete arcuate foramen and three having partial complete arcuate foramen.

Conclusion: Awareness of this type of variation is very important for neurosurgeons and radiologist during their clinical practice. The presence of the arcuate foramen would also complicate screw placement during surgery. Clinical prescreening for signs of vertebrobasilar insufficiency is important for chiropractic and manual therapies.

Keywords: Atlas, Variation, Arcuate foramen, Vertebral artery, Atlantooccipital membrane.

REFERENCES

[1]. Data AK. Essential of Human Anatomy (6th Edn) Current Book International, Kolkata. 2017;167.
[2]. Richard LM Newell. The Back in Grays Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practices, (40th edn) S. Standring, H. Ellis, J. C. Healy, D. Jhonson and A. Williams, Eds.; Churchill Livingtone, New York, NY, USA, 2008;720.
[3]. Cakmak O, Gurdal E, Ekinci G, Yildiz E, Cavdar S. Arcuate foramen and its clinical significance. Saudi Med J 2005; 26 (9): 1409–13.
[4]. Last RJ. In Anatomy Regional and applied. (4th edn) J and A Churchill Ltd. London.1996. pp. 632.
[5]. Cushing K, Ramesh V, Gardner Medwin D, Todd N, Gholkar A, Baxter P, Griffiths P. Tethering of the vertebral artery in the congenital arcuate foramen of the atlas vertebra: a possible cause of vertebral artery dissection in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43(7): 491-496.
[6]. Krishnamurthy SR, Nayak S, Khan Latha V, Prabhu Lakshmi A, Ramanathan C, Ganesh K, Abhishek PS. Arcuate foramen of atlas: incidence, phylogenetic and clinical significance Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2007;48(3): 263–266.
[7]. Limousin CA. Foramen arcuale and syndrome of Barre-Lieou. Its surgical treatment. Int Orthop 1980;4: 19-23.
[8]. Lvov I, Lukianchikov V, Grin A, Sytnik A, Polunina N, Krylov V. (2017) Minimally invasive surgical treatment for Kimmerle anomaly. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2017;8: 359-63.
[9]. Prasad B, Panchal P. A study of arcuate foramen in Human Atlas Vertebrae: Incidence and clinical correlation. International journal of current research 2018;10(05): 69545-69548.
[10]. Mitchel J. The incidence of the lateral bridge of the atlas vertebra. J of Anat 1998;193: 283-285.
[11]. Padmalatha K, Prathap Kumar J, Prakash BS, Udupa K. An Osteological Study of Arcuate Foramen in Atlas and Its Clinical Significance. Int J Anat Res 2018;6(4.2):5835-39.
[12]. Straitemeier PH, Jensen SR. Partial Regressive Occipital vertebra. Neuroradiology 1980;19: 47-49.
[13]. Jason P, Young BS, Paul H, Young MD, Michael J. The Ponticulus posticus: Implications for screw insertion into the first cervical lateral mass. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2005;87(11): 2495-98.
[14]. Mehmet S, Yakup G, Zafer YK, Murat U, Mustafa C, Davut O. The effect of posterior bridging of C-1 on craniovertebral junction surgery. J of Neurosurgery Spine 2006; 5(1); 50-52.
[15]. Limousin CA. Foramen arcuale and syndrome of barre-lieou. International Orthopaedics 1980; 4:47-49.
[16]. Gupta T. Quantitative anatomy of vertebral artery groove on the posterior arch of atlas relation to spinal surgical procedures. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30 (3): 239-242.
[17]. Malhotra VK, Tewari SP, Bajpai RN. Study of vertebral artery foramen of atlas vertebra. J Anat Soc. India 1979;28,103–105.
[18]. Lalit M, Piplani S, Arora AK, Kullar JS, Sharma T. Incidence of atlas bridges and tunnels: Their phylogeny, ontogeny and clinical implications. Rev Arg de Anat Clin 2014;6(1): 26-34.
[19]. Santhi B, Dhanlakshmi V, Yamuna EN, Manoharan C. Study of arcuate foramen of atlas vertebrae. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(1):3367-3371.

Cite this article: Buddhadeb Ghosh, Akhtaruzzaman, Md Naushad Alam Dilkash. Arcuate Foramen: An Anatomical Variation in the Atlas Vertebrae. Int J Anat Res 2022;10(2):8342-8345. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2022.113