Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 8; Issue 1.3 (March 2020)

Page No.: 7390-7394

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2020.110


Bharati Yadav 1, Rohita Salam *2.

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.

*2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.

Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India. E-Mail: rohitasalam@gmail.com


Background: Sutural bones are supranumary bones occurring along the sutures and completely surrounded by sutures of the skull. Their number, morphology and location vary in skulls. The knowledge of these bones is imperative in surgery, medicolegal cases involving child abuse or fracture of skulls and for anthropologic identification of human populations. The studies on sutural bones have traditionally been based on the studies of dry calvaria which are unreliable for the homogeneity of the population studied. Hence, this pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of 3D volume rendering of CT scan data for study of sutural bones.

Method: 3D volume rendering from 64-slice CT scan data from 64 patients was studied for incidence and location of occurrence of sutural bones.

Results: Overall incidence of sutural bone occurrence was found to be 29.69%. The most common sites for sutural bones, in descending order of occurrence, were found to be parieto-occipital suture, asterion, and lambda.

Conclusion: Sutural bone studies in concurrent populations such as this one are rare. The incidence of sutural bones in this study is similar to what another study on concurrent populations has reported. However, location of occurrence of sutural bones observed in this study was similar to all other sutural bone studies including those on dry skulls pointing to probable universality of this statistic. This preliminary study establishes the use of 3D volume rendering of CT scan data to be a valid means to acquire sutural bone data.

KEY WORDS: Sutural bones, incidence, CT scan, 3D, parieto-occipital, asterion, lambda.


  1. Standring S, Gray H, editors. Head and Neck – External Skulls. In: Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40. ed., reprinted. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. p. 409–15.
  2. Scheuer L, Black SM. The Head, Neck and Dentition. In: Developmental juvenile osteology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000. p. 36–66.
  3. Kague E, Roy P, Asselin G, Hu G, Simonet J, Stanley A, et al. Osterix/Sp7 limits cranial bone initiation sites and is required for formation of sutures. Dev Biol. 2016 15;413(2):160–72.
  4. Cremin B, Goodman H, Spranger J, Beighton P. Wormian bones in osteogenesis imperfecta and other disorders. Skeletal Radiol. 1982;8(1):35–8.
  5. Marti B, Sirinelli D, Maurin L, Carpentier E. Wormian bones in a general paediatric population. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 Apr;94(4):428–32.
  6. Govsa F, Ozer MA, Bayraktaroglu S, Aktas EO. Anatomoradiological identification of intrasutural bones for importance of cranial fracture. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(3):357–62.
  7. Hanihara T, Ishida H. Frequency variations of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. I. Supernumerary ossicle variations. J Anat. 2001 Jun;198(Pt 6):689–706.
  8. Jeanty P, Silva SR, Turner C. Prenatal diagnosis of wormian bones. J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Dec;19(12):863–9.
  9. Pandya NK, Baldwin K, Kamath AF, Wenger DR, Hosalkar HS. Unexplained fractures: child abuse or bone disease? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):805–12.
  10. Natekar PE, DeSouza FM, Natekar SP. Pterion: An anatomical variation and surgical landmark. Indian Journal of Otology. 2011 Apr 1;17(2):83.
  11. Ersoy M, Evliyaoglu C, Bozkurt MC, Konuskan B, Tekdemir I, Keskil IS. Epipteric bones in the pterion may be a surgical pitfall. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003 Dec;46(6):363–5.
  12. Hauser G, DeStefano GF. Epigenetic variants of the human skull. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 1989. 301 p.
  13. Bergman RA, editor. Skeletal systems: Cranium. In: Compendium of human anatomic variation: text, atlas, and world literature. Baltimore, Md: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1988. p. 197–215.
  14. Purohit K, Yadav B. Sutural Bones: A Study on Incidence, Laterality and Co-relation with Cephalic Index in Dry Crania of East Indian Ethnicity. IJAR. 2019 Sep 5;7(3.3):6944–57.
  15. Masih W, Gupta S, E.Chand A, Jaiswal P, P.K. S. Incidence of wormian bones in human skulls in Rajasthan. Journal of Evolution of medical and Dental Sciences. 2013 Feb 27;2:1001–4.
  16. Murlimanju BV, Prabhu LV, Ashraf CM, Kumar C, Rai R, Maheshwari C. Morphological and topographical study of Wormian bones in cadaver dry skulls. Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2011 Jan 1;28:176–9.
  17. Goyal N, Garg A, Kumar Y. Incidence and medicolegal significance of wormian bones in human skulls in North India Region. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2019;9(3):165.
  18. Patil M, Sheelavant S. Sexual dimorphism among the wormian bones in adult human skulls. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2012 Apr 1;34:124–7.
  19. Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Routal RV. A study of sutural bones in Gujarati (Indian) crania. Anthropol Anz. 1986 Mar;44(1):67–76.
  20. Shivaleela C, Kumar GV, Malipatil SB, Sandhya K. Morphological study of wormian bones in dried human skulls. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2013 Apr 1;4:584–9.                      

Cite this article: Bharati Yadav, Rohita Salam. A PRELIMINARY STUDY ON INCIDENCE OF CRANIAL SUTURAL BONES BY 3D VOLUME RENDERING OF CT SCAN IN CURRENT POPULATION IN EASTERN INDIA. Int J Anat Res 2020;8(1.3):7390-7394. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2020.110