Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 1 (February 2017)

Page No.: 3464-3469

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.367


Arora Sandeep *1,  Sanjay Kumar Sharma 2, Sadiq Wadood Siddiqui 3, Simmi Khatri 4.

*1 Associate Professor,  Department of Anatomy, Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareily, UP, India.

2,3 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareily, UP, India.

4 Gynecologist,  Private Practitioner, Bareily, UP, India.

Address for Correspondence:  Dr Arora Sandeep, MS (Anatomy), Associate Professor,  Department of Anatomy, Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareily, UP, India. Contact no.: 9814798755  E-Mail: drsamarora03@rediffmail.com


Introduction: The Foramen Magnum (FM) lies in an anteromedian position and leads into the posterior cranial fossa. It is oval and wider behind, with its greatest diameter being anteroposterior. It contains the lower end of the medulla oblongata, meninges, vertebral arteries and spinal accessory nerve. The apical ligament of dens and the tectorial membrane pass through it, to attach to the basiocciput. Anteriorly the margin of foramen magnum is slightly overlapped by the occipital condyles. Transcondylar, supracondylar, and other lateral surgical approaches provide access to various foramina on the base of skull and prevent broad retraction of the neural structures passing through them Morphometric analysis of  foramen magnum plays important role in transcondylar approach.

Aim: The study was designed to measure the diameters and shape of foramen Magnum and correlates the measurements with clinical importance,  as its shape and variation in diameters will be of great help to operating surgeon during surgical procedures.

Materials and Methods: Forty dry human skulls were studied during this research work. Skulls were taken from the department of anatomy, dayanand medical college and hospital, Ludhiana and other medical college.

Results: During this study the mean MAPD was 35.42mm, the MTD found to be 27.90mm The Foramen magnum Index found to be 17.20mm.The shape of foramen magnum found mostly was oval in 60% cases The anterior inter condylar distance found to be 18.01 to 20.00mm. Whereas middle intercondylar distance is 20.1 to 22mm and posterior was 30.01 to 32.00mm.

Conclusion: The present study had observed the variation in the measurements of skull base foramen magnum which were different from observations by the western studies because of difference of race and geographical areas.

KEY WORDS:  Foramen Magnum, Base Of Skull, Morphometry, Skull Base.


  1. Nemzek WR, Brodie HA, Hecht ST, Chong BW, Babcook CJ, Seibert JA. MR, CT, and Plain film imaging of the developing skull base in fetal specimens. AJNR. 2000; 21:1699-706.
  2. Standring S. External skull. In: Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008:409-21.
  3. Karasu A, Cansever T, Batay F, Sabanci PA, Al-Mefti O.The microsurgical anatomy of the hypoglossal canal. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:363-7.
  4. Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, Bhanumathy SP. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir (wien) 2005;147(8):889-95.
  5. Naderi S, Korman E, Citak G, Guvencer M, Arman C, Senoglu M. et al. Morphometric analysis of human occipital condyle. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2005;107:191-9.
  6. Idowu OE.The jugular foramen – a morphometric study. Folia Morphol. 2004;63(4):419-22.
  7. Gusmao S,Oliveira M, Tazinaffo U, Honey CR. Percutaneous trigeminal nerve radiofrequency rhizotomy guided by computerized tomography J.Neurosurg 2003;99:785-6.
  8. Elias MG, Silva RB, Pimentel ML, Cardoso VTS, Rivello T, Babinski MA. Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital foramen and accessories foraminas in Brazilian Skulls.Int J Morphol.2004;22(4):273-8.
  9. Aziz SR, Marchena JM, Puran A. Anatomic characteristics of the infraorbital foramen: A cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(9):992-6.
  10. Berge JK, Bergman RA. Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat 2001;14:406-13.
  11. Cicekcibasi AE, Murshed KA, Ziylan T, Seker M, Tuncer I. A morphometric   evaluation of some important bony landmarks on the skull base related to sexes. Turk J Med Sci 2004;34:37-42.
  12. Anand MK, Singh PR, Raibagkar CJ, Bhatt R. Comparison of foramina on both sides of dry human skulls. J Anat Soc India. 2002;51(1):131-2.
  13. Anil Kumar, Mitesh Dave, Sanam Anwar. MORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF FORAMEN MAGNUM IN DRY HUMAN SKULLS . Int J Anat Res 2015;3(2):1015-23.
  14. Standarding S. Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005: 460.
  15. Wise SK, Harvey RJ, Neal JG, Patel SJ, Frankel BM, Schlosser RJ. Factors contributing to failure in endoscopic skull base defect repair. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):185-91.
  16. Nevell L, Wood B. Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade. J Anat., 2008;212: 455-468.
  17. Tubbs RS, Griessenauer CJ, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb 1;66(2):385-8.
  18. Murshed KA, Çiçekcibaşi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2003 Sep 24;33(5):301-6.

Cite this article: Arora Sandeep,  Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Sadiq Wadood Siddiqui, Simmi Khatri. MORPHOMETRY AND SURGICAL IMPORTANCE OF FORAMEN MAGNUM. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(1):3464-3469. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.367
[altmetric doi=”10.16965/ijar.2016.367″ details=”right”]