IJAR.2018.187

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 2.3 (June 2018)

Page No.: 5284-5287

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.187

MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRICAL ANALYSIS OF FORAMEN MAGNUM: AN ANATOMICAL STUDY

Jignesh L Patel *1, Vipin kumar 2, Ashish M Pandya 3, Suresh P Rathod 4.

*1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay Medical College Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

4 Dean, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Address for Correspondance:  Dr.Jignesh L Patel Assistant Professor, Department Of Anatomy, American International Institute Of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan-313001, India. Mobile No. 09427008883  E-Mail: jignesh29982@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Background: Foramen magnum (FM) is an important landmark of the skull base and is of particular interest for anthropology, anatomy, forensic medicine and other medical field.  It is one of several oval or circular apertures in the base of the skull, through which medulla oblongata is transmitted. Variations of the shape of FM have got diagnostic clinical and radiological importance. The dimensions of FM have clinical importance because the vital structures that pass through it may suffer compression as in cases of FM achondroplasia and FM brain herniation, so this study aimed to access its diameter and determining its various shape.

Materials and Methods: Study sample consisted of 75 dry adult human skull of unknown sex, free from any pathology and collected from Department of Anatomy, P.D.U. Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat and American international institute of medical sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Results: The FM was observed to have round shape in 8%, egg shape in 9.33% tetragonal in 25.33%, oval in 33.33%, irregular in 2.67%, hexagonal in 8% and pentagonal in13.33% of the cases. The mean antero-posterior and transverse diameter of the FM was recorded as 34.00+/- 2.38 mm and 28.68+/-1.88 mm respectively. The Maximum diameter of antero-posterior and transverse diameter was recorded 39.53mm and 32.14mm respectively. The Minimum diameter of antero-posterior and transverse diameter was recorded 28.72 mm and 23.54 mm respectively.

Conclusion: Though the present study has a limitation as the exact age and sexes of skull were not determined, this study may provide an important reference and the measurements may be used as a data for the description of normal morphological variants of FM. The present study will be of useful to the neurosurgeons and is also helpful to the anthropologists and clinical anatomists.

Key word: Foramen magnum, Morphometry, Shape, Skull.

REFERENCES

  1. Radhakrishna S, Shivarama C, Ramakrishna A, Bhagya B. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in south Indian population. Nitte university journal of health science. 2012;2:20-22.
  2. Standring S. Gray`s Anatomy The anatomical basis of clinical practice. In: external skull. 40th ed. Spain: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p.409-21.
  3. Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: A study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2003;33:301-6.
  4. Gruber P, Henneberg M, Boni T, Ruhli FJ. Variability of Human Foramen Magnum Size. The Anatomical Record. 2009; 292:1713-19.
  5. Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlımanju BV, Prashanth KU, Prabhu LV, Saralaya VV et al. Morphological Analysis and Morphometry of the Foramen Magnum: An Anatomical Investigation. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2012;22(4):416-19.
  6. Barut N, Kale A, Turan Suslu H, Ozturk A, Bozbuga M, Sahinoglu K. Evaluation of the bony landmarks in transcondylar approach. British Journal of   2009;23:276-81.
  7. Hecht JT, Horton WA, Reid CS, Pyeritz RE, Chakraborty R. Growth of the foramen magnum in achondroplasia. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 1989;32(4):528-35.
  8. Reich JB, Sierra J, Camp W, Zanzonico P, Deck MD, Plum F. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements and clinical changes accompanying transtentorial and foramen magnum brain herniation. Annals of Neurology. 1993;33(2):159-70.
  9. Ropper AH. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements and clinical changes accompanying transtentorial and foramen magnum brain herniation. Annals of Neurology. 1993;34(5):748-49.
  10. Avci E, Dagtekin A, Ozturk AH, Kara E, Ozturk NC, Uluc K, Akture E, Baskaya MK. Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum, occipital condyle and jugular tubercle. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2011;21(2):181-90.
  11. Nevell L, Wood B. Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade. Journal of Anatomy. 2008;212:455-68.
  12. Scott JH. The cranial base. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1958;16:319-48.
  13. Zaidi SH, Dayal SS. Variations in the shape of foramen magnum in Indian skulls. Anatomischer 1988;167(4):338-40.
  14. Radhakrishnan P, Gupta C, Kumar S, D’souza AS. A Morphometric Analysis of the Foramen Magnum and Variations in its Shape: A Computerized Tomographic Study. Novel Science International Journal of Medical Science 2012;1(9-10): 281-85.
  15. Tubbs RS, Griessenauer CJ, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum. An anatomic study. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(2):385-88.
  16. Testut L, Latarjet A. Tratado de Anatomia humana. Barcelona: Salvat, 1977. 

Cite this article: Jignesh L Patel, Vipin Kumar, Ashish M Pandya, Suresh P Rathod. MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRICAL ANALYSIS OF FORAMEN MAGNUM: AN ANATOMICAL STUDY. Int J Anat Res 2018;6(2.3):5284-5287. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2018.187