IJAR.2020.244
Type of Article: Original Research
Volume 9; Issue 1 (January 2021)
Page No.: 7857-7860
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2020.244
A study of greater palatine foramen and its importance in the application of maxillary nerve block in South Indian Population
Aravinth Mahesh 1, Rajesh. S *2.
1 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Aralumoodu, Neyyatinkara, Thiruvananthapuram, 695123, India.
2 Associate professor, Department of Anatomy, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Institute, Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum, 695607, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Rajesh. S, Associate professor, Department of Anatomy, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Institute, Venjaramoodu, Trivandrum, 695607, India. Mobile no: 9042229402 E-Mail: drrajeshselvaraj@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The greater palatine foramen (GPF) is located in the posterior part of the hard palate between the articulations of hard palate with the maxilla. GPF continues posteriorly and upwards as greater palatine canal (GPC) which opens in to the inferior wall of pterygopalatine fossa. Exiting the foramen rotendum, maxillary nerve enters the pterygopalatine fossa where it can be blocked. The intraoral route of GPF approach can be preferred for maxillary nerve block because of its low incidence of complications and high success rate. For achieving a painless intra operative period in procedures involving the maxillary region and for tooth extraction achieving a perfect maxillary nerve block is of at most importance. Our present study is aimed at correctly locating the position of GPF, its shape and patency in south Indian population which will be helpful for the intra oral approach of maxillary nerve block through the GPF.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in 30 dry adult skull bones of both sex. The molar relation, shape and the patency of the GPF were observed, the readings were obtained, statistically analyzed and compared with other studies.
Results: In our observation on both side of skull, it was noted that GPF was located opposite to the 3rd molar in 90% of cases. Oval shaped GPF is most commonly found in our study which accounts to 53.35% and the overall patency rate for GPF was 95% in our study.
Conclusion: Analysis and comparison of data has proven that the position, shape and patency of GPF may vary according to different races. This study has also confirmed that the maxillary nerve block via GPF is relatively safe and easier due to the consistency of the position, shape and the patency of the GPF in south Indian population.
Key words: Greater palatine foramen, maxillary nerve block, regional blocks, Greater palatine canal, pterygopalatine fossa, Maxillary nerve.
REFERENCES
[1]. Sai Pavithra R,Thenmozhi MS. Maxillary Nerve Variations and Its Clinical Significance. J. Pharm. Sci. & Res 2014;6(4):203-5.
[2]. Aoun G, Zaarour I, Sokhn S, Nasseh I. Maxillary nerve block via the greater palatine canal: An old technique revisited. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5(5): 359–64.
[3]. Kanakaraj M, Shanmugasundaram N, Chandramohan M, Kannan R, Perumal SM, Nagendran J. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;4(2):S264–S269.
[4]. Bacci C, Ferrario S, Sivolella S, Menozzi G, Bartorelli LMG, Grossi GB, Zanette G. Maxillary nerve block: A comparison between the greater palatine canal and high tuberosity approaches. Italian Journal of Dental Medicine 2018;3(3):50-59.
[5]. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S. Radio-anatomical Study of the Greater Palatine Canal and the Pterygopalatine Fossa in a Lebanese Population: A Consideration for Maxillary Nerve Block. Journal of Clinical Imaging Sciences 2016;6(1):1-7.
[6]. Stanley F Malamed. Handbook of local anesthesia. 7th edition; 2020:234.
[7]. Methathrathip D, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Lertsirithong A, Ariyawatkul T, Sangvichien S. Anatomy of greater palatine foramen and canal and pterygopalatine fossa in Thais: Considerations for maxillary nerve block. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2005;27(6):511-6.
[8]. Kenneth L Reed, Stanley F Malamed, Andrea M Fonner. Anesth Prog 2012;59(3):127–37.
[9]. Saralaya V, Nayak SR. The relative position of the greater palatine foramen in dry Indian skulls. Singapore Med J 2007;48(12):1143-46.
[10]. Ajmani ML. Anatomical variation in position of the greater palatine foramen in the adult human skull. J Anat 1994;184:635-37.
[11]. Hassanali J, Mwaniki D. Palatal analysis and osteology of the hard palate of the Kenyan African skulls. Anat Rec 1984; 209(2):273-80.
[12]. Westmoreland EE, Blanton PL. An analysis of the variations in position of the greater palatine foramen in the adult human skull. Anat Rec 1982; 204(4):383-8.
[13]. Cheung LK, Fung SC, Li T, Samman N. Posterior maxillary anatomy: Implications for Le Fort 1 osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:346- 51.
[14]. Langenegger JJ, Lownie JF, Cleaton-Jones PE. The relationship of the greater palatine foramen to the molar teeth and pterygoid hamulus in human skulls. J Dent 1983;11:249-53.
[15]. Malamed SF, Norman Trieger. Intraoral maxillary nerve block: An anatomical and clinical study. Anesthesia Progress 1983;30(2):44–48.
