International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research

Welcome to International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research



Type of Article : Original Research

Year: 2015 | Volume 3 | Issue 6 | Page No. 1264-1270

Date of Publication: 11-12-2015

DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2015.185


Philipp Weng *1, Jessie Janssen 2, Jim D. Richards 3, James Selfe 4.

*1 Research Intern, Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire.
2 Research Fellow, Allied Health Research Unit, School of Sport, Tourism, and the Outdoors, University of Central Lancashire.
3 Professor of Biomechanics, Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire.
4 Professor of Physiotherapy, Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire.

Corresponding author: Philipp Weng, Research Intern, Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire.


Objectives: Patello femoral Pain (PFP) is the most common lower limb condition encountered in clinical practice. It recently emerged as the third highest ranked topic out of 185 in the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Musculoskeletal Research Priority Project. For a valid assessment of knee strength during rehabilitation, the isometric test using the isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex) and the hand-held dynamometer (HHD) is not well received with clinical practice. An alternative way is through functional hop tests which clinicians have used to assess their patients' lower extremity muscular strength. This study investigates the validity of knee strength assessments conducted with the HHD and the hoptest compared to the isokinetic dynamometer and also explores differences between genders of the three assessments.
Design: Each assessment included one submaximal and three recorded maximal efforts of the dominant leg. Quadriceps muscle strength was displayed in normalized torques. Correlation coefficients and box-and-whisker plots was used to analyze the data.
Setting: Movement analysis laboratory
Participants: Sixteen males (age 23.5 ± 4.23 years, height 1.79 ± 0.08 m and body mass 76.21 ± 10.58 kg, BMI 23.82 ± 2.38 kg/m²) and 16 females (age 25.38 ± 5.49 years, height 1.67 ± 0.08 m and body mass 71.99 ± 16.05 kg, BMI 25.83 ± 4.74 kg/m²) between 18 and 40 years old without any musculoskeletal injuries participated.
Main outcome measures: Knee moments normalized for bodyweight (Nm/kg) for dynamometers and distance jumped for single legged hoptest.
Results: The strongest significant correlation was found for the comparison between the HHD and Cybex (r=0.71, r²=0.504, p=0.001). Correlation between the HHD and hoptest (r=0.4, r²=0.19, p=0.013), and Cybex and hoptest (r=0.53, r²=0.295, p=0.001) were poor. Comparing genders, the normalized knee extension moment on the Cybex was 28.8% lower and with the HHD 22.3% lower for females.
Conclusions: Single legged hop test appears not to provide a suitable alternative for strength measurement in a clinical setting. Differences in hop performances, especially the use of the arms, seem to be important. Gender differences exist in knee strength assessments. The use of EMG-Analysis in further research might identify differences in muscle recruiting during all three tests.
KEY WORDS: Patello Femoral Pain (PFP), Knee Strength, Assessments, Isokinetic Dynamometer.


  1. Powers C, Bolgla L, Callaghan M, Collins N, Sheehan F. Patellofemoral Pain: Proximal, Distal, and Local Factors. J Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2012;42:1-20.
  2. Selfe J, Callaghan M, Witvrouw E. Targeted intervensions for patellofemoral pain syndrome: classification of clinical subgroups. MBJ Open, 2013;3.
  3. Rushton A, Moore A. International identification of research priorities for postgraduate theses in musculoskeletal physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique. Manual Therapy 2010;15:142-148.
  4. Boling M, Padua D, Marshall S, Guskiewicz K, Pyne S, Beutler A. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cand J Med Sci Sports 2010;20:725-730.
  5. Ferber R, McClay Davis I, Williams DS. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clinic Biomech 2003;18:350-357.
  6. Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20:60–73. [PubMed]
  7. English R, Brannock M, Ting Chick W, Eastwood L, Uhl T. The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Isokinetic Work and Single-Leg Functional Hop-Work Test. J Sport Rehabilitation 2006;15:95-104.
  8. Janssen J, Le-Ngoc L. Intratester Reliability and Validity of Concentric Measurements Using a New Hand-Held Dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2009;90.
  9. Pincivero D, Lephart S, Karunakara R. Effects of rest interval on isokinetic strength and functional performance after short term high intensity training. Br J Sports Med 1997;31:229-234.
  10. Hopper D M, Goh S C, Wnetworth L A, Chan D, Chau J, Wootton G J, Strauss G R, Boyle J. Teste-retest reliability of knee rating scales and functional hop tests one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physical Therapy in Sports 2002;3:10-108.
  11. Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomee P, Silbernagel K, Augustsson J, Thomee R, Kralsson J. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with a ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose 2005;13:778-788.
  12. Bremander A, Dahl l, Roos E. Validity and reliability of functional performance tests in meniscectomized patients with or without knee osteoarthritis. Scandinavian J Med Sci Sports  2006;17:120-127.
  13. Hamilton R, Shultz S, Scmitz R, Perrin D. Triple-Hop Distance as a Valid Predictor of Lower Limp Strength and Power. Journal of Athlethic Training 2008;43(2):144-151.
  14. Fitzgerald G, Lephart S,Hye Hwang J, Wainner M R. Hop Tests as Predictors of Dynamic Knee Stability. J Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2001;31:588-597.
  15. Eitzen I, Eitzen T, Holm I, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg M. Anterior Cruciate Ligament- Deficient Potential Corpers and Noncorpers Reveal Different Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength Profiles in the Early Stage After injury. American J Sports Medicine 2010;38:586.
  16. Clark N. Functional performance testing following knee ligament injury. Physical Therapy in Sport 2001;2:91-105.
  17. Halabachi F, Mazaheri R, Seif-Baghi T. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome and Modifiable Intrinsic Risk Faktors: How to Asses and Adress?. Asian J of Sports Medicine 2013;4(2):83-100.
  18. Petsching R, Baron R, Albrech M. The Relationship Between Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength Test and Hop Tests for Distance and One-Legged Vertical Jump Test Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1998;28:1.
  19. Ericcson Y B, Roos E M, Dahlberg L. Muscle Strength, Functional Performance, and Self-Reported Outcomes Four Years After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Middle-Aged Patients. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research) 2006;55:946-952.
  20. Greenberger HB, Paterno M V. Relationship of Knee Extensor Strength and Hopping Test Performance in the Assessment of Lower Extremity Function. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1995;22(5)5:202-206.
  21. Bolgla LA, Keskula DR. Reliability of Lower Extremity Functional Performance Tests, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1997;26:3.
  22. Carter ND, Jenkinson TR, Wilson D, Jones DW, Torode AS. Joint position sense and rehabilitation in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee BrJ Sports Med. 1997;31:209-212.
  23. Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomee P, Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:571–580.
  24. Ross MD, Irrgang JJ, Denegar CR, McCloy CM, Unangst ET.  The relationship between participation restrictions and selected clinical measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc 2002;10:10–19.
  25. Martin HJ, Yule V, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Is Hand-Held Dynamometry Useful for the Measurement of Quadriceps Strength in Older People? A Comparison with the Gold Standard Biodex Dynamometry. Gerontology 2006;52:154-159.
  26. Arnold CM, Warkentin KD, Chilibeck PD, Magnus CRA. The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement in lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults. J Strength and Conditioning Research 2010;3:815.
  27. Russel  KA, Palmieri RM, Zinder SM, Ingersoll CD. Sex Differences in Valgus Knee Angle During a Single-Leg Drop Jump. J Athletic Training 2006;41(2):166–171.
  28. Harbo T, Brincks J, Andersen H. Maximal isokinetic and isometric muscle strength of major muscle groups related to age, body mass, height, and sex in 178 healthy subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012;112:267–275.
  29. Herbert  LJ,  Maltais DB, Lepage C, Saulnier J, Crete M, Perron M. Isometric Muscle Strength in Youth Assessed by Hand-held Dynamometry: A Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity Study. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2011;5669,110, 2303-0289.


Philipp Weng, Jessie Janssen, Jim D. Richards, James Selfe. VALIDITY OF TWO CLINICAL KNEE STRENGTH ASSESSMENTS COMPARED TO THE REFERENCE STANDARD. Int J Physiother Res 2015;3(6):1264-1270. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2015.185




Volume 1 (2013)

Volume 2 (2014)

Volume 3 (2015)

Submit Manuscript