International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research

Welcome to International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research



Type of Article : Original Research

Year: 2015 | Volume 3 | Issue 3 | Page No. 1065-1067

Date of Publication: 11-06-2015

DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2015.138


Shah Sarfraznawaz F *1, Arvind Manhas 2, Kunjal Parekh 3.  

1* Sr.Lecturer, BITS Institute of Physiotherapy, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
2 Sr.Lecturer, SGM Physiotherapy College, Godhra, Gujarat, India.
3 Jr. Lecturer, BITS Institute of Physiotherapy, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Corresponding author: Shah Sarfraznawaz F, Sr. Lecturer, BITS Institute of Physiotherapy, BITS edu campus Mumbai , Vadodara-Mumbai NH#8, Varnama, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.


Aim and Objectives: To study the effect of the upper limb tension test in the management of limitation of range of motion and pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy compared with a control group.
Intervention and Outcomes: A total of 40 patients were treated with two types of interventions. The Control group received a   conservative management protocol and the Experimental group received an experimental protocol that included mobilization using the Upper Limb Tension Test in addition to the conservative protocol .The outcomes measures were flexion, extension, right side flexion and left side flexion ranges of the cervical spine and VAS score for Pain.
Results: All data collected was statistically analysed on the Stat Pac 3.0. Pre and Post test values were taken for both cervical range of motion and pain for both the Control and Experimental groups. Paired ‘t’ test was used for within the group comparison. Unpaired ‘t’ test was used for between the group comparison which showed a highly significant difference in favor of the experimental group at 99.9%(P<0.001) between the ROM of Flexion, Extension, right Side Flexion and left Side Flexion of the cervical spine.
Conclusion: The results of the study showed that adding neural mobilization using ULLT certainly benefits patients of cervical radiculopathy as far as the cervical range of motion and pain is considered.
KEY WORDS:  Cervical Radiculopathy, Mobilization of Nerves, ULTT, ROM of Cervical Spine, VAS.


  1. Ellenberg MR, Honet JC, Treanor WJ, Cervical radiculopathy Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:342-352.
  2. Farmer JC, Wisneski RJ. Cervical spine nerve root compression.An analysis of neuroforaminal pressures with varying head and arm positions. Spine.1994;19:1850-1855.
  3. Heckmann JG, Lang CJ, Zobelein I, Laumer R, Druschky A, Neuodofer B.  Herniated cervical intervertebral discs with radiculopathy:an outcome study of conservatively or surgically treated  patients. J Spinal Disord.1999;12:396-401.
  4. Tanaka Y, Kokuban S, Sato T. (i) Cervical radiculopathy and its unsolved problems Current orthopaedics 1998;12:1-6.
  5. Butler DS. Adverse mechanical tension in nervous system. A model for assessment and treatment. The Australian Journal of physiotherapy 1989;35(4):227-238.
  6. Burton S, Brunsdon J and Bleicher K. An investigation of different methods of stretching the structures which limit straight leg raise. In Proceedings 5th biennial conference Manipulative therapists association of Australia  1987.Melbourne.
  7. Korberg C and Lew P. The effect of stretching neural structures on grade I hamstring injuries. The journal of orthopedic and sports physiotherapy 1989. June: 481-487 Moll JMH and Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. Ann Rheum Disorders  1971;30:381.


Shah Sarfraznawaz F., Arvind Manhas, Kunjal Parekh. THE EFFECT OF THE UPPER LIMB TENSION TEST IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ROM LIMITATION AND PAIN IN CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY. Int J Physiother Res 2015;3(3):1065-1067. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2015.138




Volume 1 (2013)

Volume 2 (2014)

Volume 3 (2015)

Submit Manuscript