Type of Article : Orginal
Year: 2014 | Volume 2 | Issue 4 | Page No. 640-644
Date of Publication: 31-10-2014
STUDY OF SACRAL INDEX: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT REGIONAL POPULATIONS OF INDIA AND ABROAD
Poornima Janipati *1, Jyothinath Kothapalli 2, Shamsunder Rao V 3.
*1Tutor, Department of Anatomy, MNR Medical College & Hospital, Sangareddy, Medak, Telangana, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, MNR Medical College & Hospital, Sangareddy, Medak, Telangana, India.
3 Professor & Head, Department of Anatomy, MNR Medical College & Hospital, Sangareddy, Medak, Telangana, India.
Corresponding author: Dr. Poornima Janipati, Department of Anatomy, MNR Medical College & Hospital, Fasalwadi, Sangareddy, Medak, 502294, Telangana, India, Mobile No: +919989295951 E-Mail: email@example.com
Identification of sex by human skeletal remains is a critical problem and is very important in anthropological and medico legal works. Bones often survive the process of decay and therefore provide the major evidence of human age and sex after death. Over the years different authors had carried various types of measurements on human sacra of different races and regions. The present study carried out 81 sacra of unknown sex contains 45 male and 36 female sacra identified by physical characteristics. They were collected from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh region. India may be divided into four regions like North part, South part, West part, and East part for different study purpose on local population. In the present study mean sacral index in males is 104.08 and females are 115.72. The male mean sacral index value of present study is more than the values of Eastern part, north part, other worker of Southern part of India and western part except in Western part in Western Rajasthan population. The female mean sacral index value of present study is higher than the observation of Eastern part, other workers of Southern part of India, Varanasi and Jammu of north part of India and Saurashtra region of western region of India. Observations of the workers from remaining areas of Western part of India and Agra region of North India is higher than the present study. The studies on Indian population suggest that mean sacral index in females is higher than that of males.
KEYWORDS: Sacrum, Sacral index, Regions of India.
. Krogmann W. M. In the Human Skeleton in Forensic medicine. Thomas Springfield (Ellinois);1962.
. Chand P, Mukherjee B, Sahai A. An Anthropometric study of sacrum in North Indians. J Anat Sciences 1995;14:6-8.
. Sibani Mazumdar. Sexual Dimorphism and Regional Difference in Size of Sacrum: A Study in Eastern India. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2012;5(3):298-307.
. Jana T K, Koley T K, Saha S B, Basu D, Basu S K. Variation and sexing of adult human sacrum. Journal of Anatomical Society of India (Proceeding of the Anatomical Society of India).1988;37:pp II-III.
. Kataria Sushma K, Pravesh Kulhari, Kaushal Raj Kataria, Pushpa Potaliya. A study of the sacral index in western Rajasthan population in comparison with other races. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(2):383-85.
. M.M.Patel, B.D.Gupta, T.C.Singhal: Sexing of Sacrum by sacral index Kimura’s base-wing index. JIAFM, 2005:27(1);5-9
. Anterpreet Kaur Arora, Pankaj Gupta, Shashi Mahajan & Sonney Singh Kapoor. Significance of sacral index in estimation of sex in sacra of cadavers in Punjab. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(2):104–07.
. D. Ravichandran, K.C. Shanthi, K. Shankar, Harinath Chandra. A study on sacral index in Tamilnadu and andhra pradesh population of southern India. JCDR. 2013; 7(9):1833-1836. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2013/6494.3326
. Mishra S. R. et al. Identification of sex of sacrum of Agra region. JASI 2003;52(2):132-136.
. Singh S. and Potturi B. R. Greater Sciatic Notch in sex determination. J Anat Society of India 1978;125: 619-624.
. Raju P. B. et al. Sex determination and Sacrum. JASI 1980;30(1):13-15.
. Davivong. V. The Pelvic girdle of the Australian aborigines-sex differences and sex determination. Am J Phys Anthrop 1963;21:443-455.
. Martin (1928); Cited by Comas J: Manual of Physical Anthropology. 2nd Edn. Charles. C Thomes Springfield, Illnois U.S.A. 1960;415.
. Gray’s- A text book of human anatomy, 38th edition.page 257.
. Flander LB. Univariate and multivariate methods for sexing the sacrum. American journal of physical Anthropology. 1978;49(1):103-110.
. Kumar V, Pandey S. N, Bajpai R. N, Jain P. N, Longia G. S. (1992). Morphometrical study of sacral hiatus. J. Anat. Soc. India 1992;41(1):7-13.
. Vinod Kumar, Longia, G.S. and Jain, P.N. Anthropometrical study of human sacrum. J.Anat. Soc. India 1984; 33(1):57.
. Dhapate Shankar. S et al. Sexual dimorphism in sacrum. J Anat Soc Ind (Proceedings of Annual conference) 1986; 24.
. Wilder HH. A laboratory manual of anthropometry. P. Blakistons sons & Co. Philadelphia, 1920; 119 &193.
Poornima Janipati, Jyothinath Kothapalli, Shamsunder Rao V. STUDY OF SACRAL INDEX: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT REGIONAL POPULATIONS OF INDIA AND ABROAD. Int J Anat Res 2014;2(4):640-644. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2014.504