<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Int J Anat Res</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Anatomy and Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2321-4287</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2321-8967</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>International Journal of Anatomy and Research</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16965/ijar.2026.178</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Protective Effects of Vitamins A, C, and E on Ovarian Histopathology, Apoptotic Signaling, Oxidative Stress, and Early Embryonic Development in Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Toxicity in Female Rats</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Al-Rikabi</surname>
            <given-names>Sally Adnan Mousa</given-names>
          </name>
          <role>Dr.</role>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Kut-Technical Institute, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq.</aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">Dr. Sally Adnan Mousa Al-Rikabi, Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Kut-Technical Institute, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq. E-Mail: sally.adnan@mtu.edu.iq</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">2026-05-09</date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">2026-06-10</date>
        <date date-type="accepted">2026-07-15</date>
      </history>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>9622</fpage>
      <lpage>9635</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <sec>
          <title>Background</title>
          <p>Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) are one of the most common metal oxide nanomaterials produced in the world and their uses are increasing in cosmetics, food packaging, sunscreens and in pharmaceuticals as well as agrochemicals. There is increasing concern on their possible reproductive toxicity, especially on ovarian tissue in females.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Aims</title>
          <p>To investigate the role of oral co-delivery of vitamins A, C, and E (alone and in combination) in reducing ZnO-NP-induced ovarian oxidative damage, histopathological destruction, apoptotic activation, hormonal perturbation, and impaired early embryonic development in adult female Wistar rats.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Methods</title>
          <p>Forty-eight adult female Wistar rats (10-12 weeks, 180-220 g) were randomized into six equal groups (n=8) and treated by oral gavage for 28 days: G1 (saline control), G2 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg), G3-G5 (ZnO-NP + vitamin A [1000 IU/kg], C [200 mg/kg], or E [100 mg/kg]), and G6 (ZnO-NP + combined A+C+E). On the 5th gestational day (GD 5) after mating, animals were sacrificed. Assays comprised ovarian oxidative stress biomarkers (MDA, GSH, SOD, CAT), serum reproductive hormones (FSH, LH, estradiol, progesterone), haematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E) histopathology with semi-quantitative lesion scoring, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3, TUNEL assay, and blastomere/implantation metrics.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Results</title>
          <p>ZnO-NP exposure resulted in a high level of lipid peroxidation, antioxidant depletion, follicular atresia, vascular congestion, stromal edema, inflammatory infiltration, a 61-fold increase in ovarian Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (0.10 to 6.14), elevated caspase-3 activity, high TUNEL index (67.8%), and reduced blastomere cleavage/implantation. All the vitamins partially reversed these changes; the A+C+E combination produced the overall most protection with all parameters returning to statistically equal levels of controls.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec>
          <title>Conclusion</title>
          <p>ZnO-NPs cause multi-level reproductive toxicity by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway by oxidative stress in granulosa cells. Combinations of antioxidant vitamin supplements have comprehensive, synergistic effects and should be the subject of additional translational research.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>zinc oxide nanoparticles</kwd>
        <kwd>ovarian toxicity</kwd>
        <kwd>histopathology</kwd>
        <kwd>apoptosis</kwd>
        <kwd>Bax</kwd>
        <kwd>Bcl-2</kwd>
        <kwd>caspase-3</kwd>
        <kwd>TUNEL</kwd>
        <kwd>oxidative stress</kwd>
        <kwd>vitamin A</kwd>
        <kwd>vitamin C</kwd>
        <kwd>vitamin E</kwd>
        <kwd>follicular atresia</kwd>
        <kwd>early embryonic development</kwd>
        <kwd>female rats</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="intro">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Engineered nanomaterials have found their way into numerous industries in the contemporary world and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) are some of the most widely manufactured metal oxide nanomaterials on earth. These possess photocatalytic, UV-absorbing, and antimicrobial properties, along with a favourable biocompatibility profile, which has led to their use in sunscreens, cosmetics, food packaging, biomedical imaging agent formulations, feed additives, and agrochemical formulations [1,2]. This extensive use has simultaneously raised significant concerns about unintended biological impacts after occupational, environmental or dietary exposure.</p>
      <p>After oral intake, ZnO-NPs partially dissolve in the acidic gastric environment, releasing free Zn2+ ions, and remaining unabsorbed nanoparticles can cross the intestinal epithelial cell via endocytic and paracellular routes. The resultant systemic distribution leads to accumulation in the most highly perfused, metabolically active organs such as the liver, kidneys, spleen, and the gonads [3-5]. Experimental evidence is on the increase that both the particulate and ionic fraction are capable of causing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, genotoxicity and apoptosis in a variety of cell types [6,7].</p>
      <p>The mammalian ovary is especially susceptible to oxidative attacks since folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, and meiotic maturation require redox signalling that is highly controlled. The overabundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) interferes with granulosa cell proliferation, quality of oocytes, follicular atresia, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis [8-10]. It has been proven by experimental reports that subchronic exposure to ZnO-NPs increases malondialdehyde (MDA), reduces reduced glutathione (GSH), inhibits superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) as well as causes morphological damage to ovarian follicles [11,12].</p>
      <p>At the heart of the pathophysiology of oxidative follicular damage is the activation of the apoptotic cascade in granulosa cells. The balance between pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (specifically, Bax) and anti-apoptotic ones (specifically, Bcl-2) regulates the intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptotic pathway. Bax facilitates mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), the release of cytochrome c, which triggers caspase-9 and, subsequently, the executioner caspase-3, resulting in internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, which can be detected using the TUNEL assay under excessive ROS [13-17]; the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 expression in ovarian granulosa cells is thus a decisive mechanistic index of the propensity to apoptosis in toxic stress.</p>
      <p>Biologically valid possibilities to prevent this redox-mediated damage include classical antioxidant vitamins that mitigate the damage at several pathway levels. Vitamin A (retinol) and its metabolites play a role in stabilizing membranes and cell differentiation of follicular and luteal cells through nuclear retinoic acid receptors [18]. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is a strong aqueous phase scavenger of peroxyl and hydroxyl radicals, revitalizes oxidized vitamin E and is enriched in follicular fluid [19-21]. Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) selectively breaks lipid-peroxidation-chain reactions in biological membranes [22]. Although there is significant attention on the protective effects of these vitamins individually, limited comparative and combined efficacy data against nanoparticle-induced ovarian injury in particular in terms of the apoptotic signalling axis are available. The current study thus aimed to investigate whether in a well-controlled rat model of oral ZnO-NP exposure, supplementation with vitamins A, C, or E, individually and in combination, could prevent ovarian oxidative damage, histopathological destruction, apoptotic activation, endocrine disruption, and early embryonic impairment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods">
      <title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
      <sec>
        <title>Chemicals and Nanoparticle Characterization</title>
        <p>ZnO-NPs were obtained as uncoated powder (purity: 99%, primary particle size 30 ± 5 nm; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Particle morphology was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL JEM-2100), dynamic light scattering (DLS; Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS) for hydrodynamic diameter (95 ± 12 nm), polydispersity index (PDI = 0.18), and zeta potential (-18 ± 2.4 mV), and X-ray diffraction (XRD; Shimadzu XRD-6100) for crystalline phase. Before dosing, suspensions were prepared freshly in sterile 0.9% saline, sonicated (100 W, 40 kHz, 30 min, ice bath), and vortexed. Retinyl palmitate (vitamin A), L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and DL-a-tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Animals, Experimental Design, and Dosing</title>
        <p>This study was carried out at the Kut Technical Institute, Middle Technical University, Wasit Province, Iraq (Ethical Approval No. WU-2125, College of Science, University of Wasit). Forty-eight sexually mature virgin female Wistar rats (10-12 weeks, 180-220 g) and 24 fertile males were maintained under controlled environmental conditions (22°C, 55% relative humidity, 12 h light/dark cycle) with ad libitum standard diet and water following a 7-day acclimatisation period. Rats with regular 4-5 day estrous cycles were randomized into six equal groups (n = 8) and dosed daily via oral gavage for 28 days: G1 (Control, sterile saline 1 mL/kg), G2 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg), G3 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg + vitamin A [retinyl palmitate 1000 IU/kg]), G4 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg + vitamin C [L-ascorbic acid 200 mg/kg]), G5 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg + vitamin E [DL-a-tocopheryl acetate 100 mg/kg]), and G6 (ZnO-NP 100 mg/kg + combined vitamins A [1000 IU/kg] + C [200 mg/kg] + E [100 mg/kg]) administered as two individual gavages 30 minutes apart (Table 1).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <caption>Experimental groups, designations, and daily oral treatments (n = 8 per group).</caption>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Group</th>
                <th>Label</th>
                <th>Daily Treatment (oral gavage, 28 days)</th>
                <th>n</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>G1</td>
                <td>Control</td>
                <td>Sterile saline, 1 mL/kg</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>G2</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP, 100 mg/kg</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>G3</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP + Vit A</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP (100 mg/kg) + retinyl palmitate (1000 IU/kg)</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>G4</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP + Vit C</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP (100 mg/kg) + L-ascorbic acid (200 mg/kg)</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>G5</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP + Vit E</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP (100 mg/kg) + DL-a-tocopheryl acetate (100 mg/kg)</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>G6</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP + A+C+E</td>
                <td>ZnO-NP (100 mg/kg) + vitamins A (1000 IU/kg) + C (200 mg/kg) + E (100 mg/kg)</td>
                <td>8</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn>
              <p>ZnO-NP, zinc oxide nanoparticle; IU, international units.</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Mating Protocol and Preimplantation Embryo Collection</title>
        <p>Following 28-day treatment, females were cohoused with fertile males overnight (2:1). Gestational day 0 (GD 0) was confirmed by vaginal plug. On GD 5, animals were euthanized (sodium pentobarbital 100 mg/kg i.p.). Blood was collected via cardiac puncture for serum separation. Both ovaries were excised, trimmed, and weighed (right snap-frozen at -80°C for biochemistry; left fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histology). Uterine horns were flushed with 0.4% PBS-BSA to recover and morphologically evaluate preimplantation embryos under stereomicroscopy (x40).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Oxidative Stress, Hormonal Assays, Histopathology, and Apoptotic Profiling</title>
        <p>Ovarian homogenates were assayed for MDA (TBARS method), GSH (Ellman's method), SOD (pyrogallol autoxidation), CAT (H2O2 decomposition at 240 nm), and total protein (Lowry method). Serum FSH, LH, 17beta-estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were quantified via validated rat ELISA kits. Paraffin sections (5 µm) were stained with H&amp;E for differential follicle counting and semi-quantitative scoring (0-4 scale: vascular congestion, stromal edema, follicular degeneration, apoptotic bodies, inflammatory infiltration; weighted kappa = 0.88). Immunohistochemistry was conducted for Bax (1:200, Abcam ab32503), Bcl-2 (1:100, Abcam ab182858), and cleaved caspase-3 using DAB chromogen and H-score/percent positive quantification. In situ apoptotic fragmentation was quantified via DeadEnd Fluorometric TUNEL assay (Promega G3250), and caspase-3 enzymatic activity measured via colorimetric Ac-DEVD-pNA cleavage (Abcam ab39401).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
        <title>Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n = 8). Normality was verified by Shapiro-Wilk and homogeneity of variance by Levene's test. Group comparisons were conducted using One-Way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc HSD test (significance set at p &lt; 0.05) using IBM SPSS v26 and GraphPad Prism v9.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="results">
      <title>RESULTS</title>
      <p>No mortality occurred. Body weight gain was significantly reduced in G2 (27.7 ± 3.1 g vs. 54.4 ± 2.3 g in G1, p &lt; 0.05), alongside absolute ovarian weight reduction (48.3 ± 2.9 mg vs. 71.8 ± 3.2 mg, p &lt; 0.05). Vitamin co-administration progressively restored both metrics, with G6 producing complete recovery (Table 2).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption>Body weight parameters and absolute ovarian weight across experimental groups (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>Initial BW (g)</th>
              <th>Final BW (g)</th>
              <th>BW Gain (g)</th>
              <th>Ovarian Wt (mg)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>194.2 ± 4.1</td>
              <td>248.6 ± 5.8</td>
              <td>54.4 ± 2.3</td>
              <td>71.8 ± 3.2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>192.8 ± 3.6</td>
              <td>220.5 ± 6.4*</td>
              <td>27.7 ± 3.1*</td>
              <td>48.3 ± 2.9*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>193.6 ± 4.3</td>
              <td>234.1 ± 5.6</td>
              <td>40.5 ± 2.7+</td>
              <td>58.4 ± 2.7+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>195.1 ± 3.8</td>
              <td>236.9 ± 5.2</td>
              <td>41.8 ± 2.8+</td>
              <td>60.1 ± 2.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>193.0 ± 4.0</td>
              <td>239.7 ± 5.9</td>
              <td>46.7 ± 2.6+</td>
              <td>63.6 ± 2.8+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>194.7 ± 3.9</td>
              <td>245.3 ± 5.7+</td>
              <td>50.6 ± 2.4+</td>
              <td>68.9 ± 3.0+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>*p &lt; 0.05 vs. G1 (Control); +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2 (ZnO-NP); ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. single-vitamin groups (G3-G5).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Ovarian MDA nearly tripled in G2 (6.82 ± 0.58 nmol/mg vs. 2.35 ± 0.22 in G1, p &lt; 0.001), while GSH, SOD, and CAT activities fell by 59-61% (p &lt; 0.001). G6 restored MDA to 2.78 ± 0.24 nmol/mg and returned antioxidant enzymes to 85-93% of control values (Table 3). Endocrine evaluation revealed a hypergonadotropic-hypogonadal profile in G2 (elevated FSH/LH, suppressed E2/P4), which was normalized in G6 (Table 4). Follicular reserves were severely depleted in G2 with a 4-fold increase in atresia (p &lt; 0.001), completely ameliorated in G6 (Table 5).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <caption>Ovarian tissue oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzyme activities (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>MDA (nmol/mg)</th>
              <th>GSH (nmol/mg)</th>
              <th>SOD (U/mg)</th>
              <th>CAT (U/mg)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>2.35 ± 0.22</td>
              <td>28.6 ± 2.1</td>
              <td>17.8 ± 1.4</td>
              <td>42.5 ± 3.1</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>6.82 ± 0.58*</td>
              <td>11.2 ± 1.3*</td>
              <td>6.9 ± 0.9*</td>
              <td>17.6 ± 2.2*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>4.05 ± 0.34+</td>
              <td>19.4 ± 1.8+</td>
              <td>11.8 ± 1.1+</td>
              <td>28.4 ± 2.6+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>3.88 ± 0.31+</td>
              <td>20.8 ± 1.9+</td>
              <td>12.6 ± 1.2+</td>
              <td>30.2 ± 2.7+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>3.42 ± 0.28+</td>
              <td>22.7 ± 2.0+</td>
              <td>13.9 ± 1.3+</td>
              <td>33.8 ± 2.9+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>2.78 ± 0.24+‡</td>
              <td>26.5 ± 2.1+‡</td>
              <td>16.4 ± 1.4+‡</td>
              <td>39.7 ± 3.0+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH, reduced glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase. *p &lt; 0.001 vs. G1 (Control); +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2 (ZnO-NP); ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. single-vitamin groups.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl4">
        <label>Table 4</label>
        <caption>Serum reproductive hormone concentrations across experimental groups (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>FSH (mIU/mL)</th>
              <th>LH (mIU/mL)</th>
              <th>Estradiol (pg/mL)</th>
              <th>Progesterone (ng/mL)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>6.8 ± 0.5</td>
              <td>4.2 ± 0.4</td>
              <td>48.7 ± 3.2</td>
              <td>22.4 ± 1.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>11.4 ± 0.7*</td>
              <td>7.9 ± 0.6*</td>
              <td>22.6 ± 2.1*</td>
              <td>10.8 ± 1.2*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>8.9 ± 0.6+</td>
              <td>5.8 ± 0.5+</td>
              <td>33.8 ± 2.7+</td>
              <td>15.9 ± 1.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>8.7 ± 0.6+</td>
              <td>5.6 ± 0.5+</td>
              <td>35.2 ± 2.8+</td>
              <td>16.5 ± 1.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>8.2 ± 0.6+</td>
              <td>5.4 ± 0.4+</td>
              <td>37.5 ± 2.9+</td>
              <td>17.8 ± 1.6+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>7.3 ± 0.5+‡</td>
              <td>4.7 ± 0.4+‡</td>
              <td>44.9 ± 3.1+‡</td>
              <td>20.7 ± 1.7+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone. *p &lt; 0.01 vs. G1; +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2; ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. G3-G5.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl5">
        <label>Table 5</label>
        <caption>Mean ovarian follicle counts per representative histological section (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>Primordial</th>
              <th>Primary</th>
              <th>Secondary</th>
              <th>Antral</th>
              <th>Atretic</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>52.3 ± 3.4</td>
              <td>28.5 ± 2.1</td>
              <td>18.7 ± 1.5</td>
              <td>12.4 ± 1.1</td>
              <td>4.2 ± 0.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>24.8 ± 2.2*</td>
              <td>12.4 ± 1.3*</td>
              <td>7.1 ± 0.9*</td>
              <td>3.8 ± 0.6*</td>
              <td>16.9 ± 1.4*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>36.7 ± 2.6+</td>
              <td>19.8 ± 1.7+</td>
              <td>12.9 ± 1.2+</td>
              <td>7.6 ± 0.8+</td>
              <td>10.4 ± 1.0+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>37.9 ± 2.7+</td>
              <td>20.6 ± 1.7+</td>
              <td>13.4 ± 1.2+</td>
              <td>7.9 ± 0.9+</td>
              <td>9.8 ± 1.0+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>40.5 ± 2.9+</td>
              <td>22.8 ± 1.8+</td>
              <td>14.8 ± 1.3+</td>
              <td>9.1 ± 0.9+</td>
              <td>8.3 ± 0.9+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>48.1 ± 3.2+‡</td>
              <td>26.3 ± 2.0+‡</td>
              <td>17.2 ± 1.4+‡</td>
              <td>11.0 ± 1.0+‡</td>
              <td>5.4 ± 0.6+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>*p &lt; 0.05 vs. G1 (Control); +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2 (ZnO-NP); ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. G3-G5.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Histopathological scoring (Table 6, Figure 1) showed severe congestion, stromal edema, follicular degeneration, apoptotic bodies, and inflammatory infiltration in G2 (total score 17.1 ± 0.6 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 in G1, p &lt; 0.05), which was reversed in G6 (3.3 ± 0.3). Ovarian Bax expression rose from 8.2% to 72.5% in G2 while Bcl-2 dropped from 78.4% to 11.8%, elevating the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio 61-fold (6.14 ± 0.42 vs. 0.10 ± 0.01 in G1, p &lt; 0.001) alongside a 5.2-fold elevation in caspase-3 activity (42.5 ± 3.2 pmol/min/mg) and TUNEL index (67.8 ± 4.1%). G6 normalized Bax/Bcl-2 to 0.20 ± 0.02 and TUNEL index to 10.3 ± 0.9% (Table 7, Figures 2 and 3). Implantation rate was severely reduced in G2 (42.7 ± 4.2% vs. 86.4 ± 3.8% in G1, p &lt; 0.001), restored to 80.3 ± 3.7% in G6 (Table 8).</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl6">
        <label>Table 6</label>
        <caption>Semi-quantitative histopathological lesion scores (0-4 scale, mean ± SEM, n = 8; inter-observer kappa = 0.88).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>Vascular Congestion</th>
              <th>Stromal Edema</th>
              <th>Follicular Degeneration</th>
              <th>Apoptotic Bodies</th>
              <th>Inflammatory Infiltration</th>
              <th>Total Score</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>0.3 ± 0.1</td>
              <td>0.2 ± 0.1</td>
              <td>0.4 ± 0.1</td>
              <td>0.3 ± 0.1</td>
              <td>0.2 ± 0.1</td>
              <td>1.4 ± 0.3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>3.5 ± 0.2*</td>
              <td>3.3 ± 0.2*</td>
              <td>3.8 ± 0.2*</td>
              <td>3.6 ± 0.2*</td>
              <td>2.9 ± 0.2*</td>
              <td>17.1 ± 0.6*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 ZnO-NP + Vit A</td>
              <td>2.3 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.0 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.5 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.4 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.9 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>11.1 ± 0.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 ZnO-NP + Vit C</td>
              <td>2.1 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.9 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.3 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.2 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.8 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>10.3 ± 0.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 ZnO-NP + Vit E</td>
              <td>1.8 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.7 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>2.0 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.9 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>1.6 ± 0.2+</td>
              <td>9.0 ± 0.4+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 ZnO-NP + A+C+E</td>
              <td>0.7 ± 0.1‡</td>
              <td>0.6 ± 0.1‡</td>
              <td>0.8 ± 0.1‡</td>
              <td>0.7 ± 0.1‡</td>
              <td>0.5 ± 0.1‡</td>
              <td>3.3 ± 0.3‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>*p &lt; 0.05 vs. G1 (Control); +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2 (ZnO-NP); ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. single-vitamin groups.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl7">
        <label>Table 7</label>
        <caption>Immunohistochemical apoptotic markers and caspase-3 enzymatic activity (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>Bax (+%)</th>
              <th>Bcl-2 (+%)</th>
              <th>Bax/Bcl-2 Ratio</th>
              <th>Caspase-3 (pmol/min/mg)</th>
              <th>TUNEL Index (%)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>8.2 ± 1.1</td>
              <td>78.4 ± 3.2</td>
              <td>0.10 ± 0.01</td>
              <td>8.2 ± 0.8</td>
              <td>5.2 ± 0.7</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>72.5 ± 3.8*</td>
              <td>11.8 ± 1.5*</td>
              <td>6.14 ± 0.42*</td>
              <td>42.5 ± 3.2*</td>
              <td>67.8 ± 4.1*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>48.3 ± 2.9+</td>
              <td>38.2 ± 2.8+</td>
              <td>1.26 ± 0.12+</td>
              <td>26.8 ± 2.1+</td>
              <td>41.5 ± 3.0+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>45.1 ± 2.7+</td>
              <td>41.9 ± 2.9+</td>
              <td>1.08 ± 0.10+</td>
              <td>24.5 ± 2.0+</td>
              <td>38.2 ± 2.8+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>38.4 ± 2.5+</td>
              <td>50.3 ± 3.1+</td>
              <td>0.76 ± 0.08+</td>
              <td>20.3 ± 1.8+</td>
              <td>31.6 ± 2.5+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>14.2 ± 1.5+‡</td>
              <td>72.6 ± 3.2+‡</td>
              <td>0.20 ± 0.02+‡</td>
              <td>11.4 ± 0.9+‡</td>
              <td>10.3 ± 0.9+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>*p &lt; 0.001 vs. G1 (Control); +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2 (ZnO-NP); ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. single-vitamin groups (G3-G5).</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="tbl8">
        <label>Table 8</label>
        <caption>Early embryonic development parameters at gestational day 5 (mean ± SEM, n = 8).</caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Group</th>
              <th>Implantation Rate (%)</th>
              <th>Normal Embryos (%)</th>
              <th>Mean Blastomere Count (GD 5)</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>G1 Control</td>
              <td>86.4 ± 3.8</td>
              <td>91.2 ± 3.1</td>
              <td>7.8 ± 0.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G2 ZnO-NP</td>
              <td>42.7 ± 4.2*</td>
              <td>48.6 ± 3.6*</td>
              <td>3.6 ± 0.3*</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G3 + Vit A</td>
              <td>63.8 ± 4.0+</td>
              <td>68.4 ± 3.4+</td>
              <td>5.4 ± 0.4+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G4 + Vit C</td>
              <td>66.2 ± 3.9+</td>
              <td>70.7 ± 3.3+</td>
              <td>5.7 ± 0.4+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G5 + Vit E</td>
              <td>69.5 ± 3.9+</td>
              <td>73.5 ± 3.3+</td>
              <td>6.0 ± 0.4+</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>G6 + A+C+E</td>
              <td>80.3 ± 3.7+‡</td>
              <td>84.7 ± 3.2+‡</td>
              <td>7.1 ± 0.4+‡</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p>*p &lt; 0.001 vs. G1; +p &lt; 0.05 vs. G2; ‡p &lt; 0.05 vs. G3-G5.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="discussion">
      <title>DISCUSSION</title>
      <p>The pronounced elevation of ovarian MDA and concurrent loss of GSH, SOD, and CAT in ZnO-NP-treated rats reflect excessive ROS generation via Zn2+ leaching and mitochondrial electron transport chain disruption [6,7]. The resultant oxidative stress upregulates pro-apoptotic Bax via p53 and downregulates anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, promoting mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), cytochrome c release, caspase-3 activation, and internucleosomal DNA fragmentation [13-17,23-25].</p>
      <p>Microvascular endothelial damage manifested as vascular congestion and stromal edema, while damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) triggered innate immune infiltration and NLRP3 inflammasome activation [26,27]. Granulosa cell apoptosis caused follicular atresia and premature luteolysis, precipitating a hypergonadotropic-hypogonadal endocrine profile (decreased estradiol and progesterone, loss of negative feedback triggering FSH/LH surges) [8-10,28-31]. Downstream embryonic impairment (reduced implantation, cleavage retardation) reflects combined oocyte oxidative damage and defective endometrial decidualization [21,32-36].</p>
      <p>The synergistic superiority of the combined A+C+E regimen arises from distinct yet cooperative chemical and biological mechanisms: lipophilic vitamin E interrupts membrane lipid-peroxidation; hydrophilic vitamin C scavenges aqueous ROS and regenerates oxidized alpha-tocopherol; and vitamin A stabilizes cell membranes and modulates gene expression via nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) [18-22] (Figure 4).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>ZnO-NPs cause multi-level female reproductive toxicity via oxidative stress-induced activation of the intrinsic Bax/Bcl-2/caspase-3 apoptotic pathway in granulosa cells, leading to follicular atresia, endocrine disruption, and early embryonic impairment. Combined supplementation with vitamins A, C, and E provides comprehensive, synergistic histoprotective and antioxidant effects, near-completely restoring ovarian cytoarchitecture, hormonal homeostasis, and early reproductive outcomes.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <def-list>
      <title>ABBREVIATIONS</title>
      <def-item>
        <term>CAT</term>
        <def>
          <p>Catalase</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>DAMPs</term>
        <def>
          <p>Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>DLS</term>
        <def>
          <p>Dynamic Light Scattering</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>E2</term>
        <def>
          <p>17beta-Estradiol</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>FSH</term>
        <def>
          <p>Follicle-Stimulating Hormone</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>GD</term>
        <def>
          <p>Gestational Day</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>GSH</term>
        <def>
          <p>Reduced Glutathione</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>HPG</term>
        <def>
          <p>Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>IHC</term>
        <def>
          <p>Immunohistochemistry</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>LH</term>
        <def>
          <p>Luteinizing Hormone</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>MDA</term>
        <def>
          <p>Malondialdehyde</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>MOMP</term>
        <def>
          <p>Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Permeabilization</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>P4</term>
        <def>
          <p>Progesterone</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>ROS</term>
        <def>
          <p>Reactive Oxygen Species</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>SOD</term>
        <def>
          <p>Superoxide Dismutase</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>TBARS</term>
        <def>
          <p>Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>TEM</term>
        <def>
          <p>Transmission Electron Microscopy</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>TUNEL</term>
        <def>
          <p>Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>XRD</term>
        <def>
          <p>X-Ray Diffraction</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
      <def-item>
        <term>ZnO-NPs</term>
        <def>
          <p>Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles</p>
        </def>
      </def-item>
    </def-list>
    <ack>
      <p>The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of the staff of the Animal House Facility, the Central Research Laboratory, and the Department of Histopathology at the Kut Technical Institute, Middle Technical University, particularly for expert support with IHC and TUNEL procedures.</p>
    </ack>
    <fn-group>
      <fn fn-type="ethics">Approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Wasit, College of Science, Iraq (Ethical Approval No. WU-2125).</fn>
      <fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</fn>
      <fn fn-type="conflict-of-interest">The authors declare no conflict of interest.</fn>
      <fn fn-type="other">Generative AI (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used solely to improve language readability and clarity; scientific data, results, and interpretations were generated entirely by the authors.</fn>
    </fn-group>
    <ref-list>
      <title>REFERENCES</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>Espitia PJP, Soares NF, Coimbra JS, de Andrade NJ, Cruz RS, Medeiros EA. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and food packaging applications. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:1447-1464.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11947-012-0797-6</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>Vandebriel RJ, De Jong WH. A review of mammalian toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotechnology Science and Applications. 2012;5:61-71.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/NSA.S23932</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>Tang HQ, Xu M, Rong Q, Jin RW, Liu QJ, Li YL. The effect of ZnO nanoparticles on liver function in rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:4275-4285.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/IJN.S109031</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>Jia J, Li F, Zhou H, Bai Y, Liu S, Jiang Y, et al. Oral exposure to silver nanoparticles or silver ions may aggravate fatty liver disease in overweight mice. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:9334-9343.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.7b02752</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>Bhattacharya K, Davoren M, Boertz J, Schins RP, Hoffmann E, Dopp E. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA damage but not DNA-breakage in human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2009;6:17.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1743-8977-6-17</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:942916.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2013/942916</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622-627.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1114397</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:28.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1477-7827-3-28</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>Devine PJ, Perreault SD, Luderer U. Roles of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in ovarian toxicity. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:27.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1095/biolreprod.111.095224</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>Luderer U. Ovarian toxicity from reactive oxygen species. Vitam Horm. 2014;94:99-127.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-800095-3.00004-3</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>Talebi AR, Khorsandi L, Moridian M. The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on mouse spermatogenesis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:1203-1209.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10815-013-0078-y</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>Tavakoli S, Yari A, Karimi A. Protective effects of vitamin E on reproductive toxicity induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles in female rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020;198:508-517.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>Green DR, Llambi F. Cell death signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a006080.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/cshperspect.a006080</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>Shu Z, Tian D, Zhang L, Wang Y, Li X, Yang Y. The protective effect of vitamin C on reproductive toxicity induced by ZnO nanoparticles in female mice. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;191:395-403.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang H, Ji Z, Xia T, Meng H, Low-Kam C, Liu R, et al. Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano. 2012;6:4349-4368.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/nn3010087</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>Kim YJ, Kim IT, Park YK, Pyo HM, Ryu H, Kwon D, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis in human endothelial cells. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2006;27:745-751.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>Green DR. Apoptotic pathways: paper wraps stone blunts scissors. Cell. 2000;102:1-4.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00003-9</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>Clagett-Dame M, Knutson D. Vitamin A in reproduction and development. Nutrients. 2011;3:385-428.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu3040385</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang Y, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22:18-35.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>Hong JS, Park MK, Kim MS, Lim JH, Park GJ, Maeng EH, et al. Prenatal development toxicity study of zinc oxide nanoparticles in rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9(Suppl 2):159-171.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/IJN.S57932</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>Liu J, Zhao Y, Ge W, Zhang P, Liu X, Zhang W, et al. Oocyte exposure to ZnO nanoparticles inhibits early embryonic development through the gamma-H2AX and NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 2017;8:42673-42692.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.17349</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>Traber MG, Atkinson J. Vitamin E, antioxidant and nothing more. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:4-15.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.03.024</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>Cai J, Yang J, Jones DP. Mitochondrial control of apoptosis: the role of cytochrome c. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1366:139-149.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00109-1</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>Sharma V, Singh P, Pandey AK, Dhawan A. Induction of oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in mouse liver after sub-acute oral exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles. Mutat Res. 2012;745:84-91.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.12.009</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>Shahin NN, Mohamed MM. Nano-sized titanium dioxide toxicity in rat prostate and testis: ameliorative effect of morin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;334:129-141.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.taap.2017.08.014</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>Al-Ogaili AS, Hameed SS, Noori N. LPS-induced NLRP3 gene expression in chicken. Open Vet J. 2022;12(2):197-203.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i2.7</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>Radad K, Al-Shraim M, Moldzio R, Rausch WD. Recent advances in benefits and hazards of engineered nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37:578-588.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>Hussain MJ, Sarboot AK, Hussein EF. Histological study of celery aqueous seeds extract (Apium graveolens L.) on ovaries in adult female rats. Plant Archives. 2018;18(2):2717-2722.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>Abid Al-Shemary NN, Mousa SA, Muslim ZZ. Histological and hormonal study about the effect of aqueous extract of Ocimum gratissimum on female reproductive system in albino mice. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(4):765-767.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:823-839.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.7339</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>Porter AG, Jänicke RU. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6:99-104.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.cdd.4400476</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>AL-Rikabi SAM, Al Shemary NNA. The effect of letrozole treatment on the fertility and embryos parameters in female mice: Histological and hormonal study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(9):S150-S154.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47391/JPMA.IQ-31</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>AL-Rekabi SAM, Talib Abed W, Al-shemary NNA. Impact of aspirin suppositories on fertility in female mice. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2019;13(4):1505-1509.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00515.2</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>Abed WT, Mousa SA. Detection of anti-rubella IgM, IgG and antisperm antibodies in the sera of aborted and non-pregnant women in the Kirkuk City. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2019;13(4):1510-1515.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00516.4</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>Abbasalipourkabir R, Moradi H, Zarei S, Asadi S, Salehzadeh A, Ghafourikhosroshahi A, et al. Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on adult male Wistar rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015;84:154-160.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.019</pub-id>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>Almansour MI, Alferah MA, Shraideh ZA, Jarrar BM. Zinc oxide nanoparticles hepatotoxicity: histological and histochemical study. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;51:124-130.</mixed-citation>
        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.etap.2017.02.015</pub-id>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
