IJPR.2017.235

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 6 (November 2017)

Page No.: 2490-2500

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2017.235

MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAM VERSUS PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING BASIC MOBILITY IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS-A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Ranjeet Singha *.

HAAD Licensed. No- GT18592, VLCC International, Abu Dhabi, Khalidia, PO box-94159, United Arab Emirates.

Address for correspondence: Dr. Ranjeet Singha, PT, (MPT, Neurology, MIAP), HAAD Licensed. No- GT18592, VLCC International, Abu Dhabi, Khalidia, PO box-94159, United Arab Emirates. E-Mail: chitrakshi.singha@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: Individuals who have had a stroke basic mobility such as sit to stand performance and walking speed is substantially decreased as compared to nondisabled. There are limited studies which compared various Physiotherapy treatment approaches for improving basic mobility in chronic stroke patients and also follow up to find there effectiveness( in home setting) .

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of Motor relearning program (MRP) for improving the basic mobility in chronic stroke patients when compared to conventional physiotherapy (PNF-Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation).

Methodology: 30 participants were allocated by a simple random sampling using lottery method into MRP (Experimental-Group A) and PNF (Control/Conventional Group B).Both groups received treatment for 30 minutes per day,3 times per week for 3 weeks. Outcome measures were recorded at pretest, post test and post 1 month follow up using Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and Sit to stand (STS) item of Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Study was done in respective participants home. ANOVA was used for data analysis.

Results: The MRP group showed significant improvement in Timed Up and Go(TUG) Test and Sit to stand item(STS) of Motor Assessment Scale(MAS) in post test and post 1 month follow up compared to PNF group.

Conclusion: MRP is more effective than PNF for improving basic mobility of sit to stand and walking in chronic stroke subjects and subjects were able to maintain their basic mobility at 1-month follow-up also.

Key words: Basic mobility, MRP, PNF, stroke, TUG, STS, MAS.

REFERENCES

  1. Michael E. Selzer, Stephanie Clarke, Leonardo G. Cohen, Pamela W.Duncan and Fred H.Gage. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation Volume II Medical Neurorehabilitation, Cambridge.New York.2006.(Neurorehabilitation of the stroke survivor.p.579).
  2. Sandy C. Loewen, and Brian A. Anderson. Predictors of Stroke Outcome Using Objective Measurement Scales. Stroke 1990;21;78.
  3. Peter Langhorne, Fiona Coupar and Alex Pollock. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurology 2009;8;741.
  4. Susan B O‘Sullivan.Stroke .Susan B O‘Sullivan and Thomas J Schmitz .Physical Rehabilitation.5th Edition Philadelphia.F.A.Davis Company.;2001.(p.520).
  5. Melanie J. Lomaglio and Janice J. Eng. Muscle strength and weight-bearing symmetry relate to sit-to-stand performance in individuals with stroke. Gait & Posture 2005 ;126-127.
  6. Stacy L. Fritz, Ashlee L. Pittman, Anna C. Robinson,Skylar C. Orton and Erin D. Rivers, DPT. An Intense Intervention for Improving Gait, Balance, and Mobility for Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study. Journal of Neurological Physical Therapy 2007;31:71.
  7. Carr JH and Shepherd RB. Standing Up and Sitting Down, Walking, Stroke. Carr JH and Shepherd RB.Neurological Rehabilation: Optimizing Motor Performance.Butterworth Heienmann,Oxford.2000.stroke.p.260-261;274.standing up and sitting down.p.71-90.walking.p.93.
  8. Dora YL Chan, Chetwyn CH Chan and Derrick KS Au. Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20:192.
  9. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Introduction, Standing up and sitting down, walking. Carr JH, Shepherd RB.A Motor Relearning Programme for stroke. Butterworth –Heinemann Physiotherapy 2nd Edition, 1987.(introduction,p.29-35),(Standing up and sitting down, p.100-111),(walking,p.123-147).
  10. Shamay S.M. Ng and Christina W.Y. Hui-Chan. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Combined With Task-Related Training Improves Lower Limb Functions in Subjects With Chronic Stroke. Stroke 2007; 2.
  11. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Time ―Up & Go‖: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991;39(2): 142148.
  12. DCM de Wit, JH Buurke, JMM Nijlant, MJ IJzerman and HJ Hermens.The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 551.
  13. Thomas H. M. Heung and Shamay S. M. Ng.Effect of Seat Height and Turning Direction on The Timed Up and Go test scores of people After Stroke Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2009; 41: 719.
  14. Shumway Cook A and Brauer S,Woollacott M. Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community Dwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go Test. Physical Therapy 2000 Volume 80(9): 896903.
  15. Darcy A.Umphred,Nancy Byl,Rolando T.Lazaro and Margaret Roller.Interventions for Neurological Disabilities;Susan d.Ryerson.Hemiplegia.Darcy A. Umphred .Neurological Rehabilitation.4th Edition.Philadelphia.Mosby.2001.(interventions for improving neurological disabilities,p. 86),(hemiplegia,p. 743).
  16. Janet H. Carr,Roberta B. Shepherd,Lena Nordholm,and Denise Lynne .Investigation of a New Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients Physical Therapy 1985;65(2):175-180.
  17. Catherine M. Dean,Carol L. Richards and Francine Malouin. Task-Related Circuit Training Improves Performance of Locomotor Tasks in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;81:409.
  18. Claire Monger, Janet H Carr and Virginia Fowler. Evaluation of a home-based exercise and training programme to improve sit-to-stand in patients with chronic stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:361.
  19. Jacqueline C Outermans, Roland P S van Peppen, Harriet Wittink, Tim Takken and Gert Kwakkel.Effects of a high-intensity task-oriented training on gait performance early after stroke: a pilot study Clinical Rehabilitation 2010;1.
  20. Jean-Francois Bayouk, Jean P. Boucher and Alain Leroux .Balance training following stroke: effects of task-oriented exercises with and without altered sensory input .International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2006;29(1):1.
  21. RayYau Wang.Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on the Gait of Patients With Hemiplegia of Long and Short Duration.Physical Therapy 1994;74(12):25-32.
  22. Susan S.Adler,Domniek Beckers and Math Buck.Introduction to proprioceptive neuromuscular fascilitation; the scapula and pelvis:specific uses of pelvic patterns. Susan S.Adler,Domniek Beckers and Math Buck.PNF In Practice An Illustrated Guide.2nd Edition.Springer.(introduction to proprioceptive neuromuscular fascilitation,p.1),(the scapula and pelvis specific uses of pelvic patterns,p.88).
  23. Roberta B. Shepherd .Exercise and Training to Optimize Functional Motor Performance in Stroke: Driving Neural Reorganization? Neuralplasticity 2001;8(1-2):121-129.
  24. Carr JH, Shepherd RB .The Changing Face of Neurological Rehabilitation Rev. bras. fisioter. 2006;10(2):147-156.
  25. Richard W. Bohannon Review Article Muscle Strength and Muscle Training After Stroke Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007;39:14–20.

Cite this article: Ranjeet Singha. MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAM VERSUS PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING BASIC MOBILITY IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS-A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5(6):2490-2500. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.235