Haripriya S 1<\/sup>, Devika P 2<\/sup>, Prajwal U 3<\/sup>. <\/strong><\/p>\n 1<\/sup> Associate Professor, Laxmi Memorial College of Physiotherapy, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.<\/p>\n 2<\/sup> Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.<\/p>\n *3<\/sup> Postgraduate student, Laxmi Memorial College of Physiotherapy, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.<\/p>\n Corresponding Author: <\/strong>Prajwal U, Postgraduate student, Laxmi Memorial College of Physiotherapy, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. E-Mail: <\/strong>prajwalvirat053@gmail.com<\/p>\n ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n Background:<\/strong> Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is believed to impact 6.48 million individuals aged above 50 years, its prevalence increasing with advancing age. Declines in visual function serve as a strong predictor for the emergence of gait, balance and mobility limitations in older adults. Moreover, individuals classified within the lowest tier of visual acuity exhibit markedly increased likelihoods of developing disturbances in balance and gait and are at significantly greater risk of falls. \u00a0REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n [1]. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-90. \n\t\t\t <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Type of Article: \u00a0Original Research Volume 14; Issue 1 (February 2026) Page No.: 4955-4960 DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijpr.2025.157 Functional Mobility, Balance and Gait in Individuals with Early, Moderate and Advanced Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Pilot Study Haripriya S 1, Devika P 2, Prajwal U 3. 1 Associate Professor, Laxmi Memorial College of Physiotherapy, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 2
Methods:<\/strong> A pilot cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary hospital in Mangalore, Karnataka on older adults (\u2265 55 years) with POAG. Each participant was assessed using POMA, Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and MOCA. The scores of outcome measures across the early, moderate, and advanced stages of POAG were compared.
Results:<\/strong> Comparison analysis revealed that a significant deterioration was seen in functional mobility, gait, and balance in individuals with glaucoma, and the deterioration varies with disease severity.
Interpretation and Conclusion:<\/strong> There is a clear and statistically significant deterioration in mobility, balance, and gait as glaucoma progresses from early to advanced stages. This emphasizes the importance of early intervention and fall risk assessments in glaucoma management. The results of this study suggest that incorporating mobility tests into routine physical therapy assessments of individuals with early glaucoma may be beneficial.
KEYWORDS:<\/strong> Hydrophthalmos, Mobility Limitations, Postural Equilibrium, Walking Ability.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
PMid:24974815 PMCid:PMC8028030
[2]. Steinmetz JD, Bourne RRA, Briant PS, Flaxman SR, Taylor HR, Jonas JB. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144-60.
[3]. Ramulu PY, van Landingham SW, Massof RW, Chan E, Ferrucci L, Friedman DS. Fear of falling and visual field loss from glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1352-8.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.01.037
PMid:22480738 PMCid:PMC3389306
[4]. Daga FB, Diniz-Filho A, Almeida I, Lopes LC, Medeiros FA, Paranhos A Jr. Balance measures and fall risk in patients with glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(1):72-9.
[5]. Black AA, Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JE, McGwin G Jr, Owsley C, O’Connor MG. Inferior visual field loss increases fall risk in older adults with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(3):248-53.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2010.00811.x
PMid:21410740
[6]. Haymes SA, LeBlanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chiasson LA, Chauhan BC, Nguyen TK. Glaucoma and falls: functional implications of visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):61-6.
[7]. Turano KA, Herdman SJ, Dagnelie G, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, West SK. Visual field loss, gaze strategies, and orientation mobility in glaucoma. Vision Res. 2001;41(6):795-805.
[8]. Lord SR, Close JCT, Sherrington C, Menz HB, Sturnieks DL, Brodie MA. Falls in older people: risk factors and strategies for prevention. 3rd ed. Cambridge Univ Press. 2021.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108594455
[9]. Shabana N, Ahsan M, Qureshi MB, Sami D, Usman M, Shah SZA. Assessment of functional mobility in glaucoma using Timed Up and Go test: A clinical implication. Physiother Q. 2023;31(2):34-9.
[10]. Soares EC, Leite HVA, Medeiros FA, Lopes LC, Almeida I, Paranhos A Jr. The relationship between gait alterations and visual impairment in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(3):202-9.
[11]. Silva MB, Lima CA, Andrade IC, Souza GS, Silva J\u00fanior FL, Lopes LC. Functional mobility in glaucoma using performance-based tests. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2023;46(2):101-8.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.59290\/978-65-6029-002-0.14
[12]. Amemiya T, Fukuda M, Kimura Y, Tanabe K, Oishi M, Takao T. Association between dual-task performance and mobility in individuals with glaucoma. Gait Posture. 2020;82:170-6.
[13]. Liu A, Ozturk GT, Ji H, Wang R, Min Y, Wang C. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics in glaucoma patients and fall risk prediction. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):98.
[14]. Williams AL, Lackey J, Doyle L, Grosskreutz CL, Calkins DJ, Wang L. Neuroimaging studies of brain changes in glaucoma: a systematic review. SurvOphthalmol. 2020;65(6):750-64.
[15]. Frezzotti P, Giorgio A, Toto F, De Leucio A, De Stefano N, Motolese I. Structural brain changes beyond the visual system in glaucoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105931.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0105931
PMid:25162716 PMCid:PMC4146554
[16]. Ma SL, Wong WK, Chau WW, Fan DS, Lam DS, So KF. Vestibular and balance dysfunction in glaucoma: evidence for central involvement. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(7):jrm00066.
[17]. Lewis GN, Rosie JA, Woods D, Brown J, Jones M, Miles T. Physiotherapy for postural instability in visually impaired adults: a scoping review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(3):188-97.
[18]. Rodrigues-Braz MG, Lima CA, Lopes LC, Oliveira RR, Silva MB, Almeida IN. Rehabilitation strategies to enhance balance and gait in glaucoma: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(2):113-21.
[19]. Ismail A, Saleem R, Awan AR, Naseem F, Malik M, Alam F. Visual field defects and postural sway in glaucoma: a physiotherapy perspective. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(11):2584-9.
[20]. Majeed MH, Adnan MM, Saeed A, Imran T, Noor S, Tariq U. Effectiveness of physiotherapeutic balance training in reducing fall risk in patients with visual impairment. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(4):684-8.
[21]. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119-26.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x
PMid:3944402 PMCid:PMC9284826
[22]. Jahantabi-Nejad S, Azad A. Predictive accuracy of performance oriented mobility assessment for falls in older adults: A systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 May 1;33:38.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.47176\/mjiri.33.38
PMid:31456962 PMCid:PMC6708086
[23]. Salive ME, Guralnik J, Glynn RJ, Christen W, Wallace RB, Ostfeld AM. Association of visual impairment with mobility and physical function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Mar;42(3):287-92.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1994.tb01753.x
PMid:8120313
[24]. Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Bandeen-Roche K. Visual field loss and physical activity in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):248-54.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.01.037
PMid:22480738 PMCid:PMC3389306
[25]. Liu CJ, Newsome SD, Ramulu PY, West SK, Gitlin LN, Swenor BK. Functional status and gait in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;180:134-40.
[26]. Diniz-Filho A, Abe RY, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA. Gait abnormalities in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(9):760-6.
[27]. Kotecha A, O’Leary N, Melmoth D, Grant S, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF. Visual field loss and visuomotor control in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(1):473-82.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.08-2496
PMid:18806294
[28]. Black AA, Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Newman BM, Szlyk JP, Tarampi MR. Glaucoma-related mobility impairment. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(7):492-500.
[29]. Freeman EE, Munoz B, Turano KA, West SK, Bandeen-Roche K, Rubin GS. Visual field loss and mobility disability in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(9):1206-14.
[30]. Geruschat DR, Turano KA, Stahl JW, Swenor BK, Massof RW, Munoz B. Gait dynamics and gaze behavior in glaucoma. Vision Res. 2015;110:103-12.
[31]. Renna A, Drabble AJ, Pinto LA, Werner J, Sabel BA, Garcia-Finana M. Multisensory integration deficits in glaucoma: A pilot study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:699540.
[32]. Tinetti ME, Kumar C, Gleason K, Ginter S, Mody D, Han L. Dual-task mobility assessment in glaucoma. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(4):753-60.
[33]. De Luna AB, Langlois P, Ferreira A, Gonz\u00e1lez L, Kumar S, V\u00e1zquez J. Cognition and mobility in older adults with visual impairment. NeuroRehabilitation. 2024;55(2):125-32.
[34]. Majeed MH, Mathew J, Kiran S, Sudheer K, Deepika B, Krishna Rao K. Balance and strength training in visually impaired older adults: A physiotherapy approach. Indian J PhysiotherOccup Ther. 2025;19(1):13-9.<\/p>\n
+ Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1399","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1399"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1400,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1399\/revisions\/1400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJPhysiotherRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}