{"id":3161,"date":"2026-06-05T04:20:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:20:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/?page_id=3161"},"modified":"2026-06-05T04:20:25","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:20:25","slug":"ijar-2026-142","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/ijar-2026-142","title":{"rendered":"IJAR.2026.142"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"su-row\"><div class=\"su-column su-column-size-1-2\"><div class=\"su-column-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\"><div class=\"su-button-center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/ijar.14.2\/IJAR.2026.142.pdf\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#6b0e00;border-color:#560c00;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px\" target=\"_self\"><span style=\"color:#FFFFFF;padding:6px 16px;font-size:13px;line-height:20px;border-color:#98574d;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;text-shadow:none;-moz-text-shadow:none;-webkit-text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-cloud-download\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> DOWNLOAD PDF<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div> <div class=\"su-column su-column-size-1-2\"><div class=\"su-column-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\"><div class=\"su-button-center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ijmhr.org\/ijar-vol-14-2.htm\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#6b0e00;border-color:#560c00;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px\" target=\"_self\"><span style=\"color:#FFFFFF;padding:6px 16px;font-size:13px;line-height:20px;border-color:#98574d;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;text-shadow:none;-moz-text-shadow:none;-webkit-text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-book\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Table of Contents<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Type of Article:<\/strong> \u00a0Original Research<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Volume 14; Issue 2 (June<\/strong><strong>\u00a02026)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Page No.:<\/strong> 9524-9531<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2026.142<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perceptions of Phase-1 MBBS Students on Open Book (Resource) Formative Assessment in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Swathi Poornima Chandaka *<sup>1<\/sup><\/strong>, <strong>Shivasakthy Manivasakan <sup>2<\/sup><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><sup>*1<\/sup> Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Dr Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, MHPE scholar, Institute of Health Professions Education, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. <strong>ORCiD:<\/strong> 0009-0004-8649-4060<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><sup>2<\/sup> Director, Institute of Health Professions Education, Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. <strong>ORCiD: <\/strong>0000-0002-2925-0682<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Corresponding Author: <\/strong>Prof. (Dr) Swathi Poornima Chandaka, Department of Anatomy, Dr Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, MHPE scholar, Institute of Health Professions Education, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India. <strong>E-Mail:<\/strong> swathi79poornima@gmail.com<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Background:<\/strong> Contemporary medical education emphasizes critical reasoning and knowledge application rather than rote memorization. Open-book formative assessments (OBFA) provide an authentic approach that fosters analysis, synthesis, and problem-solving. However, evidence on their role in enhancing higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) among Phase-1 MBBS students in India remains limited. This study explored student perceptions of OBFA in fostering HOTS and identified its perceived benefits and challenges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Methods: <\/strong>A cross-sectional mixed-methods study using an explanatory sequential design was conducted among 137 Phase-1 MBBS students in Andhra Pradesh. Participants undertook both closed-book and open-book formative assessments in anatomy. Quantitative data from a validated questionnaire (Cronbach\u2019s \u03b1 = 0.707) and qualitative data from ten focus-group discussions (7\u20138 students each) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and Braun and Clarke\u2019s thematic framework.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Results: <\/strong>Mean scores improved significantly from closed-book (12.95 \u00b1 3.54) to open-book assessments (18.41 \u00b1 2.07; p &lt; 0.001). Students perceived OBFA as enhancing critical thinking (3.91), application of anatomical knowledge (3.99), and analytical integration (4.09). It reduced anxiety (3.82) and promoted self-directed learning (3.99). Perception of OBFA strongly correlated with analytical integration (r = 0.71, p &lt; 0.001). Themes reflected a shift from memorization to conceptual learning, improved problem-solving, and reduced stress, though time constraints and resource management posed challenges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Conclusions: <\/strong>OBFA fosters higher-order cognitive engagement, conceptual understanding, and independent learning among early-phase medical students. With appropriate orientation and faculty training, its integration with traditional methods can strengthen CBME-aligned assessment practices.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Keywords:<\/strong> Open-Book Examination, Formative Assessment, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Self-Directed Learning, Competency-Based Medical Education.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[1]. Adams NE. Bloom&#8217;s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):152-3.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3163\/1536-5050.103.3.010<br \/>PMid:26213509 PMCid:PMC4511057<br \/>[2]. V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3 (2):77-101.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa<br \/>[3]. Alghamdi AG. Assessing Medical Student Perceptions of Open-Book Exams for Self-Directed Learning. Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59218.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.59218<br \/>[4]. Mahmoudzadeh -Sagheb H,Heidari Z,Mohammadi M.A survey of the students perspectives of open book examinations in the histology \/ embryology course.Journal of Medical Education ,2015;14(1):26-32.<br \/>[5]. Dayananda R, Mahantesh Patil, Manjunath S N, Rajapur Parshuram, Vijay Kautilya.Study of students&#8217; perception regarding open-book assessment and closed-book exams.Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine &amp; Toxicology 2021;15(1):946-949.<br \/>[6]. Eldakhakhny B, Alamoudi AA, Gad H, Almoghrabi Y, Shamrani T, Daghistani H, Bima A, Ajabnoor G, Alfayez F, Elsamanoudy A. Introducing Group Open-Book Exams as a Learning and Assessment Strategy in the Clinical Biochemistry Course for Medical Students. Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51792.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.51792<br \/>PMid:38322080 PMCid:PMC10844773<br \/>[7]. Feldhusen, J.F. An evaluation of college students&#8217; reactions to open-book exami nations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1961;21:637-645.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/001316446102100310<br \/>[8]. Broyles IL, Cyr PR, Korsen N. Open-book tests: assessment of academic learning in clerkships. Med Teach 2005;5:456-62.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01421590500097075<br \/>PMid:16147801<br \/>[9]. Dale VH, Wieland B, Pirkelbauer B, Nevel A. Value and benefits of open-book examinations as assessment for deep learning in a post-graduate animal health course. J Vet Med Educ. 2009; 36:403-410.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3138\/jvme.36.4.403<br \/>PMid:20054078<br \/>[10]. Eilertsen TV, Valdermo O. Open-book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Stud Educ Eval. 2000;26:91-103.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0191-491X(00)00010-9<br \/>[11]. Agarwal PK, Roediger HL 3rd. Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test. Memory. 2011;19:836-852.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09658211.2011.613840<br \/>PMid:21995673<br \/>[12]. Skidmore RL, Aagaard L. The relationship between testing condition and student test scores. J Instr Psychol. 2004;31:304-314.<br \/>[13]. Jehu, D., Pincton, C.J., &amp; Cher, S. The use of notes in examinations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970;40:353-357.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8279.1970.tb02139.x<br \/>[14]. Brightwell, Richard &amp; Daniel, Janine-Helen &amp; Stewart, Angus. Evaluation: is an open book examination easier?. ECU Publications.2004;3. <br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3108\/beej.2004.03000004<br \/>[15]. Weber LJ, McBee JK, Krebs JE. Take home tests: An experimental study. Res High Educ. 1983;18:473-483.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00974810<br \/>[16]. Ben-Chaim D, Zoller U. Examination-type preferences of secondary school students and their teachers in the science disciplines. Instr Sci. 1997;25:347-367.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1002919422429<br \/>[17]. Baillie C, Toohey S. The &#8220;power test&#8221;: Its impact on student learning in a materials science course for engineering. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 1997;22:33-48.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0260293970220103<br \/>[18]. Bobby Z,Meiyappan K. \u201cTest-enhanced&#8221; focused self-directed learning after the teaching modules in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education.2018;46(5):472-7.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bmb.21171<br \/>PMid:30369035<br \/>[19]. Haladyna, Thomas &amp; Rodriguez, Michael. Developing and Validating Test Items. 2013; New York- Routledge, 1st Edition.<br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203850381 <br \/>[20]. Hancock, G. R. Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple-choice and constructed response test formats. Journal of Experimental Education, 1994;62(2):143-157. <br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00220973.1994.9943836<br \/>[21]. Martinez, M. E. Cognition and the question of test item format. Educational Psychologist, 1999;34(4), 207-218. <br \/>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15326985ep3404_2<br \/>[22]. Marzano, R. J., &amp; Kendall, J. S. The new taxonomy of educational objectives. The new taxonomy of educational objectives 2nd Ed (Vol. 2nd) 2007. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n\t\t\t <div class=\"promo1\" style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7; border-color: #6b0e00 #e8e6e6 #e8e6e6;\">\n             \t <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Cite this article:<\/strong><\/span> Swathi Poornima Chandaka, Shivasakthy Manivasakan. Perceptions of Phase-1 MBBS Students on Open Book (Resource) Formative Assessment in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills. Int J Anat Res 2026;14(2):9524-9531. <strong>DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>10.16965\/ijar.2026.142\u00a0 \n             <\/div>\t\n\t\t\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type of Article: \u00a0Original Research Volume 14; Issue 2 (June\u00a02026) Page No.: 9524-9531 DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2026.142 Perceptions of Phase-1 MBBS Students on Open Book (Resource) Formative Assessment in Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills Swathi Poornima Chandaka *1, Shivasakthy Manivasakan 2. *1 Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Dr Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation,<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/ijar-2026-142\">+ Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3161"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3161"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3174,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3161\/revisions\/3174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}