{"id":2598,"date":"2022-03-04T15:46:39","date_gmt":"2022-03-04T15:46:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/?page_id=2598"},"modified":"2022-03-04T15:46:39","modified_gmt":"2022-03-04T15:46:39","slug":"ijar-2021-204","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/ijar-2021-204","title":{"rendered":"IJAR.2021.204"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/i> DOWNLOAD PDF<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i> Table of Contents<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

Type of Article:<\/strong> \u00a0Original Research<\/h3>\n

Volume 10; Issue 1 (March 2022)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Page No.:<\/strong> 8275-8282<\/h3>\n

DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2021.240<\/h3>\n

A Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Study on the Morphology of Renal Vessels, Their Variations and Clinical Implications<\/h3>\n

Manu Gupta 1<\/sup>, Nisha V Kaul 2<\/sup>, Ashish Kumar Shukla 3<\/sup>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

*1<\/sup> Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5403-6805<\/p>\n

2<\/sup> Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.<\/p>\n

3<\/sup> Professor & HOD, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.<\/p>\n

Corresponding Author:<\/strong> Mrs. Manu Gupta, (Ph.D. Scholar), Batch-2108, C\/O Dr. Nisha V Kaul, Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India- 201009. E-Mail:<\/strong> manug0409@gmail.com \u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

ABSTRACT<\/h3>\n

Introduction:<\/strong> The kidneys–the main organs of the excretory system, are supplied by a paired renal artery, originating from the Abdominal Aorta at the level of a disc between L1 and L2 and drained by a paired renal vein exiting from the hilum of the kidney to the Inferior vena cava.<\/p>\n

Aim: <\/strong>To evaluate the morphology of renal vessels, their variations & clinical implications during renal surgeries in the subjects of the North India population by contrast-enhanced MDCT.<\/p>\n

Materials and Method<\/strong>: The present study was conceptualized & carried out in the Department of Anatomy, in collaboration with the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Santosh Medical College & Hospital, Ghaziabad and from Dr. O.P Gupta Imaging Centre, Meerut. This study was performed on the 108 patients who were referred for abdominal CECT examination with suspected abdominal pathologies. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan images of the Abdomen were reviewed for normal anatomy of renal vessels and their variants.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Result:<\/strong> Out of 108 patients, anatomical variations of the renal vessel were found in 72 (66.66%) patients. Variations of the renal artery were found in 56 patients (51.85%). Out of these 56 patients, 47 had supplementary renal artery, 17 had early branching of the renal artery and 8 patients had both supplementary and early branching of the renal artery. Supplementary renal arteries were seen in 15 patients on the right side, 16 patients on the left side & 16 patients bilaterally. Earlier branching of the renal artery was found in 9 patients on the right side, 10 patients on the left side and in 2 patients bilaterally. Variations of the renal vein were more commonly found on the right side, late renal vein confluence was seen in 28 (25.92%) patients and supplementary renal veins in 9 (8.3%) patients. On the left side, 2 (1.85%) patients had late renal vein confluence and 2 (1.85%) patients had retroaortic vein.<\/p>\n

Conclusion:<\/strong> Variations of the renal artery are found frequently. Morphological evaluation of renal vessels is useful for planning and performing the endovascular, laparoscopic and urological procedure.<\/p>\n

Key words:<\/strong> Renal artery (RA), Renal vein (RV), Supplementary Renal artery (SRA), Early branching (EB), Supplementary renal vein (SRV), Contrast-enhanced Multidetector Computerized Tomography (MDCT).<\/p>\n

REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1]. Standring S. Gray\u2019s Anatomy. Vol. 40. Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 1183
[2]. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four-year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999; 14: 2090\u20132093
[3]. Budhiraja, V. Rastogi, R. Jain V, Bankwar V. Anatomical variations of renal artery and its clinical correlations: a cadaveric study from central India. J. Morphol. Sci. 2013; 30(4):228-33.
[4]. Bordei P, Sapte E, Iliescu D. Double renal arteries originating from the aorta. SurgRadiol Anat. 2004; 26: 474\u20139.
[5]. Mathews R, Smith PA, Fishman EK, Marshall FF, Anomalies of the inferior vena cava and renal veins: embryologic and surgical considerations. Urology.1999; 53(5):873\u2013880.
[6]. Kramer B, The incidence of the renal venous collar in South African blacks, S Afr Med J. 1980; 57(21):875\u2013876.
[7]. Kumar S, Neyaz Z, Gupta A. The Utility of 64 Channel Multidetector CT Angiography for Evaluating the Renal Vascular Anatomy and Possible Variations: A Pictorial Essay. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11: 346-354
[8]. Singla RK, Sharma T, Gupta R. Retro-aortic left renal vein with left suprarenal vein draining into inferior vena cava. IJAV. 2010; (3):134-7.
[9]. Chai JW, Lee W, Yin YH, Jae HJ, Chung JW, Kim HH,Park JH. CT angiography for living kidney donors; accuracy, cause of misinterpretation and prevalence of variation. KJR. 2008; 9(4): 333-339.
[10]. Kadir S. Kidneys. In: Kadir S, (ed). Atlas of normal and variant angiographic anatomy. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. 1991; 387\u2013429
[11]. Sungura RE. The CT angiography pattern of renal arteria anatomy among Africans and its implication on renal transplantation: a cross sectional descriptive study at Kenyatta National Hospital. Dig Repository. 2012; 56: 307
[12]. Ghonge NP, Gadanayak S, Rajakumari V. MDCT evaluation of potential living renal donor, prior to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: What the transplant surgeon wants to know? Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014; 24:367
[13]. Gulas E, Wysiadecki G, SzymanskiJ, Majos A, Stefanczyk L, Topol M, Polguj M. Morphological and clinical aspects of the occurrence of accessory renal arteries. Arch Med Sci. 2018; 14(2): 442\u2013453.
[14]. P\u00e9rez JA, Torres FG, Toribio AM, Fern\u00e1ndez LK, Hayoun C, Naranjo ID. Angio CT assessment of anatomical variants in renal vasculature: its importance in the living donor. Springer. 2013; 4: 199-211
[15]. Merklin RJ, Michels NA. The variant renal and suprarenal blood supply with data on the inferior phrenic, ureteral and gonadal arteries: a statistical analysis based on 185 dissections and review of the literature. JICS.1958; 29 (1):41\u201376.
[16]. Felix W. Manual of Human Embryology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1912. The development of the urogenital organs. In: Keibel F, Mall FP, editors; pp. 752\u2013880.
[17]. Keibel F, Mall FP. Manual of human embryology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott. 1912; 820\u201325.
[18]. Singla RK, Sharma T, Gupta R. Retro-aortic left renal vein with left suprarenal vein draining into inferior vena cava. IJAV. 2010; (3):134-7.
[19]. Pick JW, Anson BJ. The renal vascular pedicle: An anatomical study of 430 body halves. J Urol. 1940; 44:411-34.
[20]. Koc Z, Ulusan S, Oguzkurt L. Association of left renal vein variations and pelvic varices in abdominal MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17 (5):1267-74.
[21]. Karazincir S, Balci A, Gorur S, Sumbas H, Kiper AN. Incidence of the retroaortic left renal vein in patients with varicocele. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26 (2):601-4.
[22]. Kumar S, Neyaz Z, Gupta A. The Utility of 64 Channel Multidetector CT Angiography for Evaluating the Renal Vascular Anatomy and Possible Variations: A Pictorial Essay. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11: 346-354
[23]. Gumu\u015f H, Bukte Y, Ozdemir E, \u00c7etin\u00e7akmak MG, Tekba\u015f G, Ekici F, Onder H, Uyar A. Variations of Renal Artery in 820 Patients Using 64-Detector CT-Angiography, Renal Failure. 2012, 34:3, 286-290.
[24]. Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Muangsomboon K, Schulam PG, Gritsch HA. Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors. AJR. 2006; 186:1630-1638.
[25]. Majos M, Stefanczyk L, Szemraj-Rogucka Z, Elgalal M, Caro RD, Macchi V, Polguj M. Does the type of renal artery anatomic variant determine the diameter of the main vessel supplying a kidney? A study based on CT data with a particular focus on the presence of multiple renal arteries. 2018;40: 381-388.
[26]. Zainel MA &Suhelmawloodalnajjar. Incidence and Variations of Aberrant Renal Arteries in Kidney Donors Cases. Medico-legal Update. 2020; 20(1).
[27]. Bolatli G, Kardeniz MU, Koplay M, Musa Acar, Zarasiz I. Investigation of Renal Artery Variations with Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography Technique. Bsj Health Sci.2021; 4 (1): 22-25
[28]. Famurewa OC, Asaleye CM, Ibitoye BO, Ayoola OO, Aderibigbe AS, Badmus TA, Variations of renal vascular anatomy in a Nigerian population: A computerized tomography study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018; 21(7):840-846
[29]. VedaRaju KS, BooBathi Raja G, Ananda M, Jayashri d. Evaluation of Renal Vascular Anatomy in Prospective Renal Donors Using 128 Slice CT Angiography. IJARS. 2018;7(2):20-24.
[30]. Kumaresan M, Sankaran PK, Gunapriya R, Karthikeyan G, Priyadarshini. A morphometric study of renal vein and its variations using CT. IJMRPS. 2016; 3(11)
[31]. Jose N, Jayaprakash V, Deiva A, Sai V, Jayakumar M. Renal angiographic evaluation of prospective renal donors: Single\u2011center data and outcome analysis from South India – A retrospective observational study. Indian J Transplant. 2021; 15: 24-8.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t

\n \t Cite this article:<\/strong><\/span> Manu Gupta, Nisha V Kaul, Ashish Kumar Shukla. A Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Study on the Morphology of Renal Vessels, Their Variations and Clinical Implications. Int J Anat Res 2022;10(1):8275-8282. DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>10.16965\/ijar.2021.204\u00a0 \n <\/div>\t\n\t\t\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Type of Article: \u00a0Original Research Volume 10; Issue 1 (March 2022) Page No.: 8275-8282 DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2021.240 A Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Study on the Morphology of Renal Vessels, Their Variations and Clinical Implications Manu Gupta 1, Nisha V Kaul 2, Ashish Kumar Shukla 3. *1 Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh,
+ Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2598"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2598"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2623,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2598\/revisions\/2623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}