{"id":1386,"date":"2018-07-05T15:00:49","date_gmt":"2018-07-05T15:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/?page_id=1386"},"modified":"2018-07-06T13:03:11","modified_gmt":"2018-07-06T13:03:11","slug":"ijar-2018-243","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/ijar-2018-243","title":{"rendered":"IJAR.2018.243"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"su-row\"><div class=\"su-column su-column-size-1-2\"><div class=\"su-column-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\"><div class=\"su-button-center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/ijar.6.3\/IJAR.2018.243.pdf\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#6b0e00;border-color:#560c00;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px\" target=\"_self\"><span style=\"color:#FFFFFF;padding:6px 16px;font-size:13px;line-height:20px;border-color:#98574d;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;text-shadow:none;-moz-text-shadow:none;-webkit-text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-cloud-download\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> DOWNLOAD PDF<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div> <div class=\"su-column su-column-size-1-2\"><div class=\"su-column-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\"><div class=\"su-button-center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ijmhr.org\/ijar-vol-6-3.htm\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#FFFFFF;background-color:#6b0e00;border-color:#560c00;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px\" target=\"_self\"><span style=\"color:#FFFFFF;padding:6px 16px;font-size:13px;line-height:20px;border-color:#98574d;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;text-shadow:none;-moz-text-shadow:none;-webkit-text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-book\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Table of Contents<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Type of Article:<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0Original Research<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Volume 6; Issue 3.1 (July 2018)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Page No.:<\/strong>\u00a05464-5467<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2018.243<\/h3>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\">VARIATION IN BRANCH FREE LENGTH OF RENAL ARTERY AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANS: A 64-SLICE CT ANGIOGRAPHIC MORPHOMETRIC STUDY<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Anshu Mishra *<sup>1<\/sup>, P K Sharma <sup>2<\/sup>, Punita Manik <sup>3<\/sup>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><sup>*1 <\/sup>Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, IIMS &amp; R, Kursi Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.<\/p>\n<p><sup>2<\/sup> Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, ELMC, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.<\/p>\n<p><sup>3<\/sup> Professor, Department of Anatomy, KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Corresponding author:<\/strong> Anshu Mishra, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, IIMS &amp; R, Kursi Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. <strong>E-Mail: <\/strong>mishra.anshu685@gmail.com<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>ABSTRACT:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Background:<\/strong> Length of renal artery is an important morphological parameter while performing surgeries in renal area. The present study was conducted to evaluate variations in length of renal artery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Materials and Methods:<\/strong> The study was conducted in the department of anatomy and department of radiology of King George\u2019s Medical University, Lucknow. 53 subjects (106 renal arteries), undergoing 64-slice CT angiography for different indications were included in the study group. The angiographic images of all the subjects in abdominal region were analyzed for renal arteries and their length was measured utilizing computerized tools.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Results: <\/strong>The length of main renal artery varied from 8.5mm to 54.8mm on the right side. On the left side minimum length was 7.7mm and maximum length was 48.8mm. The average length of renal artery was 30.5\u00b110.4 mm on the right side and 26.91\u00b110.0 mm on the left side. There was great variation in the length of renal artery due to variation in site of ramification.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong> The variation of renal artery length is critically important for maintaining vascularity of kidney after surgery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Key words<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Renal artery, Length, prehilar branching, CT Angiography.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al., editors. Gray\u2019s Anatomy, The Anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40<sup>th<\/sup> New York; Churchill Livingstone; 2008; pp 1231-1232.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Tann M, Persohn SA, Leapman SB, Filo RS, et al. Evaluation of prospective living renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multisection CT: the marriage of minimally invasive imaging with minimally invasive surgery. Radiographics 2001; 21: 223-236.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nitin P Ghonge, Satyabrat Gadanayak1, Vijaya Rajakumari 2 MDCT evaluation of potential living renal donor, prior to laparoscopic donor<br \/>\nnephrectomy: What the transplant surgeon wants to know?<br \/>\nIndian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2014; 24 (4): 367 to 378.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kolla Praveen1, Pentyala Suneetha2, Lattupalli Hema3, CT angiography of renal arteries: anatomy, variants and its importance in the living donor. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2016; 15( 8): 73-78<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT evaluation of living renal donors prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy. RadioGraphics 2004; 24: 453-466.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zhang J, Hu X, Yin X, Huang T, Ren L, Yin H, et al. The role of multi-detector row CT in evaluation of living renal donors. Chin J Organ Transplant (Chin) 2009; 30: 419-421.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Singh AK, Sahani DV, Kagay CR, Kalva SP, Joshi MC, Elias N, et al.; Semiautomated MIP images created directly on 16-section multidetector CT console for evaluation of living renal donors. Radiology, 2007; 244: 583-590.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Richstone L, Seideman C, Baldinger L, Permpongkosol S, Jarrett TW, Su LM, et al. Conversion during laparoscopic surgery: frequency, indications and risk factors. J Urol 2008; 80: 855-859<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Saldarriaga B, Pinto S A, Ballesteros L B, Morphological expression of the renal artery. A direct anatomical study in a Colombian half-caste population Int. J. Morphol.; 26(1):31-38, 2008.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Holden A, Smith A, Dukes P et al., Assessment of 100 live potential renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multidetector row helical CT. Radiol, 2005; 237: 973\u201380<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Burgarin E, Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard? Arch. Surg., 2000; 135:943-7.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Singh A, Sarin P; Multispiral CT angiography of renal arteries of live potential renal donors: A review of 118 cases, Transplantation, 2004; 77(10): 1535- 9.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n\t\t\t <div class=\"promo1\" style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7; border-color: #6b0e00 #e8e6e6 #e8e6e6;\">\n             \t <span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Cite this article:<\/strong><\/span> Anshu Mishra, P K Sharma, Punita Manik. VARIATION IN BRANCH FREE LENGTH OF RENAL ARTERY AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANS: A 64-SLICE CT ANGIOGRAPHIC MORPHOMETRIC STUDY. Int J Anat Res 2018;6(3.1):5464-5467.\u00a0<strong>DOI:\u00a0<\/strong>10.16965\/ijar.2018.243\u00a0 \n             <\/div>\t\n\t\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type of Article:\u00a0\u00a0Original Research Volume 6; Issue 3.1 (July 2018) Page No.:\u00a05464-5467 DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.16965\/ijar.2018.243 VARIATION IN BRANCH FREE LENGTH OF RENAL ARTERY AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANS: A 64-SLICE CT ANGIOGRAPHIC MORPHOMETRIC STUDY Anshu Mishra *1, P K Sharma 2, Punita Manik 3. *1 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, IIMS &amp; R, Kursi Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/ijar-2018-243\">+ Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1386"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1417,"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1386\/revisions\/1417"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ijmhr.org\/IntJAnatRes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}